Jump to content

User talk:Electron9/2013-06-24

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of RDOS (ekblad) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RDOS (ekblad) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RDOS (ekblad) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Earlier discussions: User talk:Electron9/2013-01-22

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RDOS (ekblad), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borland C (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Exploding Sun (movie) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Natalie Brown
Findus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bute

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contamination drug "Bute" = Phenylbutazone disambig ?

[edit]

Electron9, Phenylbutazone is used in horses as a pain relief, or a reducer of fevers. Clenbuterol isn't used with horses in any way. Phenylbutazone was used for humans in the past, but is no longer used as it is a possible risk for humans. This explains why the Findus meat may be dangerous as the Phenylbutazone within the HORSEmeat can be dangerous when consumed by humans. Cobbie98 (talk) 11:04, 12 Febuary 2013 (UTC)

FYI Electron, if you need help on the horse stuff, feel free to post on talk over at [{WP:EQUINE]]. We can clarify matters further if needed. Montanabw(talk) 20:11, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Electron9. You have new messages at AldezD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AldezD (talk) 16:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And my edits were hardly something worth adding to the DRN. AldezD (talk) 16:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [1] and [2] AldezD (talk) 16:09, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

[edit]

Sorry about the edit conflict in 2013 meat adulteration scandal. Am adding some source material, will try to fix edit conflicts if I hit another one. Montanabw(talk) 20:09, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Exploding Sun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solar storm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Query

[edit]

What were you trying to do here? --John (talk) 17:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Easier to read dates and link to disease that is relevant to horses. Electron9 (talk) 19:56, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Our manual of style recommends using consistent date styles within an article. On this one it is DMY as shown by the template. See also sections are intended to link other articles which are not otherwise linked in the article.--John (talk) 21:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Horse meat

[edit]

Hey, I made a further comment in replay to what you said about my concern of selection of companies, you didn't make any further comments or objections, when I said that I will remove the bit on case I know more about. So why do you restore this now and still don't make any comments? As I said before I doubt listing every single party involved in continent-wide case is possible and listing minor cases is overemphasizing their involvement ~~Xil (talk) 02:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If a canned meat brand is tainted. People should know. Electron9 (talk) 03:00, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
But, as I said on article's talk, Wikipedia's purpose is not to warn people about something. It sounds more like mission statement of a newspaper. In this case it actually might be creating wrong impression to the people - it seems there might be plenty of cases of food mislabeling, if you focus on few cases, it creates impression that nobody else is involved. So on one hand it is WP:UNDUE and unfair to these companies, considering they too did not know what meat it is, and other hand, even if we assume that we should be protecting interests of general public, by misrepresenting the facts and not giving accurate overview you are misleading them to believe that all other food is safe ~~Xil (talk) 03:47, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orders of magnitude (inductance), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferrite (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waldemar Jungner, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Edison and Dilution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Solder may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:28, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Universal Power Adapter for Mobile Devices may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • working on [[power supply]] standards that caters to the power range of {{nowrap|10 - 130 W}} (optionally {{nowrap|240 W}} for mobile devices like laptops.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Orders of magnitude (data) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | 5 000 000 bits – Typical English book volume in plain text format {{nowrap|(500 pages × 2000 characters}} per page and 5-bits per character.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:56, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unit multiples

[edit]

[3]

I remind you that “k” is a standardized SI prefix which means 1000. If you ever made a low-level programming, then you should know that 1000 bytes unit does not have use there. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 04:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ever used MB?, does it mean 1000 000 bytes or 1048 576 bytes? Electron9 (talk) 10:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I know about the problem with ambiguous use of “M” and “G”. SI defines k = 103 but does not say anything about “K”, and JEDEC memory standards define K = 210. Just do not bring the dirt where it was not already present, please. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The hint is the context, ie computer memory equals base 2 is used. Physics stuff equals base 10 etc.. Thus it can from the context VGA -> computer -> memory be deduced that base 2 is used and thus kB will there mean 1024 bytes. The only real mayhem is the use of GB being 10^9 in context of harddisks. Electron9 (talk) 12:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you saw the power-on self-test screen on PCs, especially old PCs, then you could notice that it features KB (such as 640 KB, 1024 KB, 4096 KB, 32768 KB…) and never kB. JEDEC seconds this with its notation. And, not least, neither SI nor IEC do not recommend “k” for 1024 (IEC recommends Ki which is closer to “K” than to “k”). Your edit was a mistake, and if you will not make such “improvements” in the future, then there is no point to continue arguing here. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 00:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So how does JEDEC handle MB 1000000 vs 1048576 bytes ..? I used KB all the way until I figured it doesn't add up in the bigger picture. Electron9 (talk) 01:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Commodore 65, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double-sided (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]