User talk:EmilyCipriani
- Welcome!
Hello, EmilyCipriani, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for helping us build a great free encyclopedia. We have five basic principles, but other than that, we advise that you be bold and edit. If you ever have any questions or need help, feel free to leave a message at the help desk, and other Wikipedia editors will be happy to assist you.
Thanks again and congratulations on becoming a Wikipedian!
P.S. New discussion threads for you will appear at the bottom of this page.
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 53 Stevenson Street Kew, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 53 Stevenson Street. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 01:21, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 53 Stevenson Street
[edit]
A tag has been placed on 53 Stevenson Street, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Way2veers 01:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 53 Stevenson Street Kew
[edit]A tag has been placed on 53 Stevenson Street Kew, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Way2veers 01:27, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
EmilyCipriani, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi EmilyCipriani! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Anatol Kagan in Stevenson Street
[edit]I appreciate your enthusiasm for Anatol Kagan in Stevenson Street, as evidenced by your multiple attempts to write an article about this subject.
Even with your recent changes, I am not convinced that it meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. While Anatol Kagan appears to be "notable" by Wikipedia standards he is not so famous that any work of his has a "de facto presumption" of notability.
Also, the article on the home contains far, far too much information about the architect. Information about the architect in this article should be pretty much limited to things that are specifically relevant to this structure. Anything else should be moved to Anatol Kagan or, if it is not important enough to put in that article, discarded.
Also, please add more "in-line" citations (see WP:INCITE for details). Just about every sentence in this article needs a clear citation from a reliable source (click on the wikilink to see the formal definition of "reliable source").
If the article stays "as-is" or it is changed but its notability is not made clear very soon, I intend on nominated it for deletion using the "articles for deletion" ("AFD") process. This process typically takes a minimum of 7 days, during which time you can and should continue to improve the article. I am going to hold off at least 1 day so you can tackle the notability issue - if notability becomes clear the article will survive AFD so there would be no point in me nominating it. If you need a few days to work in this, say so and I'll wait a few more days.
By the way, welcome to Wikipedia. Consider asking around at the Teahouse for general help with editing Wikipedia. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:02, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Anatol Kagan in Stevenson Street
[edit]
The article Anatol Kagan in Stevenson Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Orphaned article in which may have original research and fails WP:N. Just an ordinary house and thus also a non-notable building.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Snowager-is awake 23:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)