User talk:Emily Brewton

Hi.... I just reviewed the article you created on James E. Brewton. It looks good for a first article. There are a couple of things you might want to do next. First, Wikipedia relies on demonstrated notability. That is, the subject of the article should be noteworthy. This is demonstrated through in-text citations from 3rd party sources (see wp:cite). I think that the subject here is noteworthy, but the article would be enhanced by outside verification (newspaper or journal mentions) about his awards. The article now refers to the fact that he "...won awards and prizes..", but only lists one in the text. You might do well to list others. Second, and probably a small thing because the article is written with a neutral point of view, your username suggests that you are perhaps related to the subject. It is usually difficult for someone to write an unbiased article about someone to whom they are related. It's not forbidden, but you want to take care that the article sticks to facts without embelleshments. Which I think you've done very well thus far. Just my opinions and thoughts. Cheers! Wikipelli ^Talk 17:11, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you so much! I very much appreciate the welcome and the feedback. I will add more on Jim's awards as you suggest. Thank you again!Emily Brewton (talk) 18:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Emily Brewton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Wikipelli ^Talk 22:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Marion Holland was accepted

Marion Holland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Hello! I'd like to put a new article draft in my sandbox; do I delete the Marion Holland draft that's already there? I don't see how I do that; I'm sorry to be a bother, and thank you so much for your help. Here's the sandbox: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Emily_Brewton/sandbox&redirect=no Emily Brewton (talk) 17:39, 23 November 2022 (UTC) Emily Brewton (talk) 17:39, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The short answer is yes! If you follow the link you gave, you should be able to edit the page, and then it's just a case of removing the redirect and adding your new content. If you don't want the redirect in the page's history, you are welcome to use {{db-g7}} on the page to request it be deleted first. A third option for you is to create a new sandbox, either at something generic like User:Emily Brewton/sandbox 2 or something related to the subject you wish to write about, such as User:Emily Brewton/Joe Bloggs. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 17:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very very much! I appreciate your help. Emily Brewton (talk) 19:03, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Rosenthal (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.artandhonor.com/simon-m-rosenthal.html. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Simon Rosenthal may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 21:10, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Emily Brewton! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 21:10, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Rosenthal (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A good amount of the references are written by the article subject. Wikipedia is not interested in what the subject has to say for himself, but what others say of him Examples: Ref 2, 3, 10, 12, 14, 22 and 23. Some are poorly formed references, please read WP:INTREF3 if you are using Visual Editor or WP:CITEHOW (and the links inside to the templates) if you are using the Source editor

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon Rosenthal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Rich, Thank you for your time and helpful comments. I'll continue to edit the article. Emily Brewton (talk) 20:30, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Simon Milyus Rosenthal ca 1962.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Simon Milyus Rosenthal ca 1962.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Rosenthal (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.artandhonor.com/simon-m-rosenthal.html. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Simon Rosenthal may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 13:37, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Simon Rosenthal has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Simon Rosenthal. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Rosenthal has been accepted

Simon Rosenthal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! Emily Brewton (talk) 14:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]