User talk:Erkenntnis123

This is Erkenntnis123's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Documentation Centre Political Islam (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This just tells about the existence of this organization, and does not summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about it or why it is important.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Documentation Centre Political Islam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 10:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Erkenntnis123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 10:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Documentation Centre Political Islam (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You have added a list of publications by this organization, but not done as I requested before. If you are associated with this organization, please read about conflict of interest and paid editing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Documentation Centre Political Islam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 10:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Documentation Centre Political Islam (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Documentation Centre Political Islam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 06:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Documentation Centre Political Islam (January 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The vast majority of sources are their documents which should be used very sparingly and some of the other sources make no mention of Documentation Centre Political Islam. Nothing suggests this can meet the notability guidelines.

S0091 (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All the sources show the relevance of the official documentation center beyond Austria. How many sources do you need? Why is the article not accepted? Erkenntnis123 (talk) 22:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, Erkenntnis123, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Bingrau (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 23:40, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have also not address the previous queries about WP:COI or WP:Paid, which is required. S0091 (talk) 23:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Documentation Centre Political Islam

Hello, Erkenntnis123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Documentation Centre Political Islam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After I am basically interested in the subject and find it important. It would have been important to me to create an article here with the appropriate sources, but unfortunately this was not accepted. Erkenntnis123 (talk) 17:06, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Documentation Centre Political Islam

Hello, Erkenntnis123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Documentation Centre Political Islam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After I am basically interested in the subject and find it important. It would have been important to me to create an article here with the appropriate sources, but unfortunately this was not accepted... Erkenntnis123 (talk) 17:05, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 15:26, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have only tried to contribute proactively and backed everything up with sources, if that is not accepted here I guess I have to accept that. Erkenntnis123 (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned. You were asked in January to disclose your paid editing. You were asked to respond above. You have persistently evaded the question. Therefore:

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

~Anachronist (talk) 18:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Erkenntnis123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, it is important for me to note that I feel prejudged and even bullied by some users because I dared to create an article that they obviously do not like ideologically. I have created the page on the center after it is, in my view, an interesting pioneering project in Europe on Islamist movements. The project unfortunately did not have a page, so I decided to register here and create the page. There is a need for education against racists, fundamentalists or other extremists, that was and is my motive to create this page. That the place was not mentioned has surprised me and it was my self-motivation to create this page. It was about backgrounds in relation to Islamist movements in Europe, such as Hamas or the Muslim Brotherhood, were revealed in this article, instead I am now accused of business interests... Unfortunately, it seems to me that some users want to relativize Islamist movements, because certain sources and recognized scientists were unfortunately not accepted. But that my first project was attacked here so demotivated me to edit more articles, which is why I haven't registered for a while and missed certain messages. Now I can't prove accusations that are actually untrue, because an innocent person can hardly prove his guilt. Therefore, I hope that other admins deal objectively with the topic, which is very polarized due to the Middle East conflict. I commit myself to all the rules here and I'm sorry if violations have come. I confirm that I have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements now. I just wanted to get involved, and I'll be using the "Talk" page to initiate debates on controversial issues in the future. I'm happy to take any other tips with me. I will pay more attention to the rules because of this experience and hope for a good solution. Erkenntnis123 (talk) 17:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Bingrau as well as Elbanus. The technical data is straightforward and clear. Yamla (talk) 18:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You still haven't answered the question- are you a paid editor or have other association with this center? 331dot (talk) 23:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If these questions are answered, would it be possible to re-register? Who decides? Is there an objective procedure? Erkenntnis123 (talk) 08:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you are blocked, you must make a successful unblock request in order to regain the ability to edit. Your request is reviewed by an administrator such as myself(but not the blocking admin, or, with subsequent requests, admins who have already reviewed one). See Appealing a block for more information about the process.

You should not create a new account to edit or edit via IP address, that is block evasion. You personally are blocked and may not edit Wikipedia, not just your account. 331dot (talk) 08:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot My bad, I thought I'd blocked this sock. I will now. Doug Weller talk 09:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback and the information @331dot. I really hope to clear up the confusion. It reassures me to hear that a broad process is taking place here. I admit I feel prejudiced by some users because they reject certain opinions for seemingly ideological reasons... Erkenntnis123 (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your views are not necessarily relevant, except if those views make it difficult or impossible for you to function in this collaborative environment. Given that you are now under a checkuser block, only a checkuser can authorize its removal. 331dot (talk) 12:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot so the views they post in your link are abhorrent and I reject as staunchly as other extremist views that suppress freedom and Islamist movements have committed human rights crimes (like slavery) especially in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond that should not be relativized. .. especially not in an encyclopedia... Enlightenment and creating awareness against racists, fundamentalists and other extremists should be possible on Wikipedia... there should be no relativization here... Erkenntnis123 (talk) 13:07, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever your views or anyone's agreement or disagreement with them (neither 331dot nor I support extremists in any case}, you are blocked and the only use of your talk page should be to appeal the block. If this continues I will remove your ability to post here. Doug Weller talk 14:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And you have still failed to address the reason for your original block: undisclosed paid editing. Your repeated and obstinate failure to address this speaks volumes about your willingness to abide by the community policies and guidelines here. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 09:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]