User talk:EverythingBen

February 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Inuit have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Inuit was changed by EverythingBen (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890485 on 2022-02-23T19:21:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Iran have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:18, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes I confused ppp with gdp my bad EverythingBen (talk) 00:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing must cease.

Please discontinue your disruptive editing on the Iran page. Continuing to do so may result in your account being blocked from future editing. Consider reviewing WP:DE. WikiAmerican1 (talk) 02:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Nobody (talk) 09:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing about Iran

Please stop replacing sourced numbers with (higher) random GDP numbers to increase Iran's rank. The RedBurn (ϕ) 10:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am using the one by the united nations not random numbers EverythingBen (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am using the Official GDP (Nominal) and per capita by the U.N not random numbers if you looks at the web page of countries by gdp you can see the United Nations one I am not trying to improve irans rank I just think the U.N is a better source EverythingBen (talk) 05:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im aware the IMF is part of the U.N but the U.N still has a different ranking if you look, I am not in any way in support of the Islamic Republic EverythingBen (talk) 05:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you say so, but it surely looked like it by your changes on the lists (copying U.N. data over the IMF one). As far as I know, all countries articles use the IMF data, so you'd have to propose a change for all those articles. Note that the U.N. data is for 2021 instead of 2023.

Note that your previous change about the HDI ("updated hdi to most accurate") didn't make sense, as you replaced the 2021 one by the 2016 one (without changing the reference by the way). The RedBurn (ϕ) 07:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to use the UN data, you have to ask to replace all the countries' data with those of the UN, you are welcome to request to replace IMF data with those of the UN. But until you get a consensus to change the economic data to those of the UN, do not edit and try to raise Iran's rating. I have already several times reverted your edits that jumped Iran's ranking to 22 from 45 without any source supporting it. Qplb191 (talk) 08:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The RedBurn although it’s well known the the world bank is much more reliable the the IMF and the UN . It is the most prestigious and respected body in the world, in my opinion if we want to change the World Bank is the best source. Qplb191 (talk) 09:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok sorry for the wait but thank you EverythingBen (talk) 02:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing March 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mesopotamia and List of Mediterranean countries. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. WikiAmerican1 (talk) 18:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing - Iran

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did in Iran. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.

Iran is not at the crossroads of Africa and Asia. You may be confused with Egypt. Iran, in its entirety, is an Asian country. Please, take your time and research accordingly before continuing to make edits. WikiAmerican1 (talk) 17:34, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eggism

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eggism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improving your Wikipedia Articles

Hey EverythingBen! I noticed your contributions to Wikipedia, particularly the article you created about Eggism. It's great to see your interest in contributing to the encyclopedia!

I've noticed that the article you created has some issues, including lack of sources, context, and no adherence to Wikipedia's layout and style guidelines and it has been nominated for speedy deletion. While editing can be a learning process, it's essential to ensure articles meet Wikipedia's standards for accuracy and neutrality.

I recommend reviewing Wikipedia's Manual of Style, Writing your first article and Writing Better Articles guide to enhance your editing. Additionally, focusing on adding reliable sources and organizing the article into a proper format with a lead section and sub-sections will improve its quality.

Remember, Wikipedia values accuracy, verifiability, neutrality, and notability. It's important to conduct thorough research and maintain an encyclopedic tone in your writing. Happy editing! ZyphorianNexus (talk) 21:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=.I have been wrong fully blocked on wikipedia i have contributed to nearly 100 articles I am writing to you to express my sincere apologies for violating Wikipedia's policies by creating an article about someone I know. I understand now that this action goes against Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest and neutrality.

I deeply regret my lapse in judgment and acknowledge the impact it may have had on the integrity of Wikipedia's community-driven platform. My intentions were not to deceive or manipulate, but rather to contribute what I believed to be valuable information. However, I now recognize that my actions were misguided and inappropriate.

I take full responsibility for my mistake and assure you that it was not done with malicious intent. I have since familiarized myself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including those on notability and conflict of interest, to ensure that I fully understand the principles of responsible editing.

I am committed to abiding by Wikipedia's rules and contributing positively to the community in the future. I have learned from this experience and am genuinely remorseful for any disruption or inconvenience I may have caused.

With humility and respect, I kindly request that you reconsider my ban and grant me the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to constructive editing on Wikipedia. I assure you that I will adhere strictly to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines moving forward.

Thank you for taking the time to review my appeal. I appreciate your consideration and understanding}}

. Bbb23 (talk) 23:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]