Jump to content

User talk:Evosoho

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Explanation of what vandalism is, timeline of your deletions with the exploding articles

[edit]

RE: [1]

Vandalism is never adding or removing material in a good faith manner. Dream Focus appears to be acting in a good faith manner. He is restoring the referenced material which you deleted, before or while the article was being put up for deletion.

Camponotus saundersi
nominated Camponotus saundersi for deletion. 13:51, 26 September 2009.[2]
Deleted: Workers are 4 to 6 mm long.<ref name=emery1889>Emery 1889: 516</ref> 14:59, 26 September 2009[3]
Deleted: ==Footnotes== {{reflist}} 14:59, 26 September 2009.[4]
Deleted almost all of the text of the article, no reason given, tagged as "minor": "Its defensive behaviours include self-destruction by autothysis. Two oversized, poison-filled mandibular glands run the entire length of the ant's body. When combat takes a turn for the worse, the ant violently contracts its abdominal muscles to rupture its body and spray poison in all directions." 19:51, 26 September 2009.[5]
Deleted reference section, reason given "correcting": "* {{aut|Emery, Carlo}} (1889): Viaggio di Leonardo Fea in Birmania e regioni vicine. XX. Formiche di Birmania e del Tenasserim raccolte da Leonardo Fea (1885-87). ''Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale Giacomo Doria (Genova)'' 2 '''7'''(27): 485-520. [ PDF]" 19:55, 26 September 2009 [6]
Dream Focus reverts Evosoho's deletions. 20:10, 26 September 2009.[7]
Evosoho removes rescue template, reason given "canvassing" 20:12, 26 September 2009 [8]
Evosoho reverts Dream Focus restoration of material, reason given: "no vandilizm dream focus was vandalizng" 20:13, 26 September 2009.[9]
Template:Exploding_animals
Evosoho deletes nine of the eleven entries from the template. 20:38, 26 September 2009 [10]
Irbisgreif puts the article up for WP:TFD, Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Exploding animals 20:52, 26 September 2009.[11]
Evosoho deletes the last two entries from the template. 21:00, 26 September 2009[12]
Exploding animals
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding donkey result: merge. 9:44, 24 September 2009
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding sheep result: keep, Nomination withdrawn with intent to merge, 19:44, 24 September 2009
Evasoho merges Exploding donkey into Exploding animals. 20:08, 24 September 2009 [13]
Evasoho merges Exploding rat into Exploding animals. 21:15, 24 September 2009.[14]
Evasoho merges Exploding toads into Exploding animals. 14:39, 26 September 2009[15]
Evasoho puts the article Exploding animals up for deletion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding animal (3rd nomination) [16]

Ikip (talk) 22:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Various exploding creatures

[edit]

You seem to be on a bit of a mission to remove all trace of exploding animals from Wikipedia. I don't know what your motivation is for this, but this edit, removing references with an edit summary of "correcting", this edit, removing the {{tl:rescue}} tag with an edit summary of "canvassing" and this edit, removing content with no edit summary are disruptive, as they removed all the referenced content from the article - which you had nominated for deletion. Furthermore, the edit summaries make them dishonest. What exactly was your aim here?  pablohablo. 23:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A word of caution

[edit]

It is to be remembered, that no matter your personal feelings on an article, if it has been listed at AfD and another editor has tagged it for ARS's assistance in improving the article, it is quite improper to remove the Rescue tag, as removal of such could itself be seen as disruptive to other's efforts to improve the encyclopedia. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 00:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

I started a report at WP:ANI about the issues brought up today. Joe Chill (talk) 23:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Evosoho. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection.
Message added 23:45, 26 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NW (Talk) 23:45, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFC/Username

[edit]

I have opened an RFC regarding your signature. You can participate at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_names. Gigs (talk) 05:27, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism" to San Serriffe

[edit]

Hi Evosoho, can you explain your use of the word "vandalism" in the edit summary to three reverts you made to this article today? I don't understand. Best wishes Flapdragon (talk) 17:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

[edit]

Non Free Images in you User Space

[edit]

Hey there Evosoho, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free images are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:Evosoho/Sandbox/archive/IAC. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 01:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

[edit]
[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Extended hours trading, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://invest-faq.com/cbc/trade-after-hours.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Extended hours trading saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! NilsTycho (talk) 16:23, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

[edit]

Arrr-mania listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arrr-mania. Since you had some involvement with the Arrr-mania redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:51, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

[edit]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Home screen for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Home screen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Home screen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ringbang (talk) 22:01, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Evosoho&oldid=1039743956"