User talk:Exchange33

Welcome!

Hello, Exchange33, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 22:01, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janet Gillespie (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Catrìona was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janet Gillespie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Janet Gillespie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Catrìona (talk) 02:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Exchange33! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Catrìona (talk) 02:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jude (Judas) Hall (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Buidhe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

An admirable individual, but notability isn't inherited from his brother-in-law. The first and fourth sources have only two passing mentions of the subject, while source #5 appears self-published and therefore not reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jude (Judas) Hall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jude (Judas) Hall, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

b ui dhe (formerly Catrìona) 05:06, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janet Gillespie (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not seeing much independent notability for this person. Sources are from her obituary, marriage announcement, which are primaries. The book reviews are helpful but not fleshed out as criticism.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janet Gillespie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Janet Gillespie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification on recent Prince Hall Masonry edits

I've noticed your recent addition to the article on Prince Hall Masonry. I don't think it was clear as to which masonic body in California you were referring to. As I'm sure you know, there are multiple groups claiming to be the legitimate Prince Hall grand lodge in California, and it would probably be best to clarify. Pepe Oats (talk) 01:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pepe, It took me a while to get clarification, but the Hannibal Lodge #1 was his first lodge, he then became WM of the Grand Lodge. This has been verified by this reply: My name is Louis L. Garrett, Sr. Worshipful Master Hannibal Lodge #1 in San Francisco. PGM James M Whitfield was a member on Hannibal Lodge # 1 in San Francisco and the Worshipful Master in the 1860's. Doing that time their were four Grand Masters out of Hannibal, This information came from the California Grand lodge history book. Exchange33 (talk) 17:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Exchange33[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jude (Judas) Hall (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need one or two more sources like the first one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jude (Judas) Hall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jude (Judas) Hall, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:16, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jude Hall has been accepted

Jude Hall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 14:03, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Janet Gillespie

Hello, Exchange33. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Janet Gillespie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lupin VII (talk) 00:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Artwork question

Hello, Exchange33! I just want to confirm that you are the original artist of the painting you uploaded, File:Jude Hall at the Powder House by RM Allen 2021.jpg. The notice you added implies that to be the case. I'm surprised to see the copyright holder of such a work release it under a creative commons license. --Midnightdreary (talk) 00:23, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yes I painted that and gifted it to the American Independence Museum. It is free for all to use. Thanks for asking. Exchange33 (talk) 14:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]