User talk:FarhadUltrasound

Welcome![edit]

Hi FarhadUltrasound! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Zefr (talk) 16:56, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I still wait your Answer.　Your reply is not an answer. FarhadUltrasound (talk) 19:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in High-intensity focused ultrasound. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. It is evident that English is not a language you know well. Please either get assistance with your writing at WP:TEA or edit a Wikipedia in your own language - List of Wikipedias. Zefr (talk) 16:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply by SCIENCE. Are you relly Scientist？I do not think so. FarhadUltrasound (talk) 19:21, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Meters. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to High-intensity focused ultrasound have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. What are you doing? That ref is clearly discussing prostate cancer. Meters (talk) 05:19, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive?

Your 50 micron meant Ultrasound 40 MHz one wave !!!!! FarhadUltrasound (talk) 14:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Spirulina (dietary supplement), you may be blocked from editing. Zefr (talk) 19:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To Meter,

The fomula of temperature caliculation is just a apply to Gamma Function Formula.

It is just use the dimention in the cyrinder internal event. It is not varid for external energy apply.

it is no use of heat caliculation. Do you understand? This section is totally fake. FarhadUltrasound (talk) 17:30, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FoodData Central[edit]

This USDA-FDC link is the one from the spirulina article. FDC is the most extensive and reliable source of nutrition information for foods on Wikipedia. Zefr (talk) 19:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This regacy. USDA erased this data once.The recent report that the contents are widely varied by the cultivation. The package are shown total value recently. Please see PRESENT. FarhadUltrasound (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ALSO, I found that that indicated the commercial URL www.self.com so remedy it.

But the right after, it was changed to lead to USDA Regacy!!!

Did you do that? FarhadUltrasound (talk) 19:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Zefr,

You do not reply the point. I fund that the linked URL is the commercial www.self.com that advertised the helth food.
The USDA Regacy data is just accumlated th past documented values taken from some other food laboratories , so they say that Regacy. That is Champion Data we called. YSDA did not analyze the data.
Many national food laboratories such as China, India that are major production countries report the Spirulina contents are very varied with the condition of the culltivation and exploring the effective standard of the methods of the representation. Just look the PRESENT commercial Spilurina package in the store, it shows total value only, not shown REGACY data.
Some content of Spirulina such as Vitamin B12 that the Regacy shown is not Vitamin B12, it was determined that it was not by newly precised m-HPLC analysis. It was determined and very harmful to consumpt the folic acid that いinhibits the production of nerve cellsand red cells.
Are you Scientist?

FarhadUltrasound (talk) 11:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For example, the USDA value of folic acid is different with your table, folic acid is generating in Chlorophyll TCA cycle, not in phycocyanin . NOT exist in Spirulina. Still Creative? Please see USDA chart.

The most important point you did not mention is Digestive or not for human, the half of Spirulina protein is "lienteric". FarhadUltrasound (talk) 19:39, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Spirulina (dietary supplement), you may be blocked from editing. You cannot change content or quotes to be what you want it to say. Content on medical issues depends on WP:MEDRS sources. Zefr (talk) 17:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had proposed the questions for you. Please reply. I think you ware asking me WIKI should be constructive.

it is not nessesary to write TRUTH, do you remenber? and this your warning is just supposed the vandarize of the truth. FarhadUltrasound (talk) 18:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you really the PHD? Where degree? FarhadUltrasound (talk) 18:27, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you do not need a degree to edit wikipedia, nor do you need a degree to check a source -a really self-degrading name(speak of the devil)- 20:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I teach you that FDA's PMA will be expired within 5 years if the crinical results are sufficient effects.

Is this your CONSTRUCTUVE, not need TRUTH?

YOU need basic common sense and true scientific basic knowledge. Not NOVEL. FarhadUltrasound (talk) 19:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

teahouse question[edit]

i have answered your question in the teahouse, if you need anything, feel free to ask me! (PS, this is my first TH message so it may not be standard, if so notify me on my talk page) -a really self-degrading name(speak of the devil)- 19:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose you have prenty of comminucation problem. I want to have your papers. Which？ FarhadUltrasound (talk) 02:58, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The re-writing of the doubt value of folic acid to USDA value ZERO would be "prenty of comminucation problem" ? What are you? I want to see your papers DNA research???????????? FarhadUltrasound (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its not an answer. FarhadUltrasound (talk) 03:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated misinterpretation of sources, disruptive editing, and insufficient English-language communication skills.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]