User talk:Floydian/Archive/2013c
This is an archive of my talk page from September through December 2013
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Floydian. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Restoule
You deleted references to two of my sites along with an additional site for Nogo Farms. Why. I believe they should have been left alone. I run the Restoule.com site. David aka computerfella — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.225.164.65 (talk) 14:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Manning
Thank you for removing the material under discussion. I was somewhat annoyed that sportsfan5000 put it back in and was sorely tempted to remove it myself again. Silly of me, I suppose.Two kinds of pork (talk) 23:08, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ontario Highway 30, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Codrington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:29, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:101 construction between Chapleau and Foleyet, 1961.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:101 construction between Chapleau and Foleyet, 1961.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:23, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:417 Alta Vista overpass 1961.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:417 Alta Vista overpass 1961.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:21 Redirection near Goderich.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:21 Redirection near Goderich.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:25, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:27 widening and Toronto Bypass construction, 1954.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:27 widening and Toronto Bypass construction, 1954.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:25, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:401 pre-widening at Keele, March 21, 1958.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:401 pre-widening at Keele, March 21, 1958.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:25, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:417 west from Carling.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:417 west from Carling.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:25, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:48 and 401 cloverleaf.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:48 and 401 cloverleaf.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:26, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:71 Sioux Narrows, 1951.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:71 Sioux Narrows, 1951.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:26, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:73 at Copenhagen.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:73 at Copenhagen.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:7A - CausewayAerial60.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:7A - CausewayAerial60.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Please add reference
see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ontario_Highway_21&diff=576821920&oldid=568205578 thanks --Frze > talk 06:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for spotting that! Must have written it in a draft or removed it in an earlier revision. Not sure off the top of my head what the citation was exactly but I'll try and sleuth it out. Cheers, Floydian τ ¢ 07:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
The source you listed tells that this is a "Photo from Cameron Bevers' historical photograph collection". Do you know what this maens? Do you think that he has scanned an old postcard, or is this an old family photo? It says that the original photographer is unknown, but this is often true for both postcards and family photos. For example, I can usually not tell whether my old family photos were taken by my grandmother or by my grandfather. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:46, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- I doubt its a family photo or postcard, because he usually mentions those cases and because its hundreds of kilometres from his family home. More likely it's something he picked up in his travels (yard sale), or its a picture from a book that he can't remember. The photo quality is too spot-on to be amateur at that point in time methinks. - Floydian τ ¢ 20:03, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ontario Highway 2A, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chatham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:28, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
The Center Line: Fall 2013
Volume 6, Issue 4 • Fall 2013 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Wikidata maps
If you include a map through Wikidata, it must be on Commons; otherwise, it won't work if other language Wikipedias want to use that relation. Also, bots check Commons and don't find the file, and this happens. --Rschen7754 21:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Weak... And I doubt they'll change that. Damn you Commons! *shakes fist at clouds above* - Floydian τ ¢ 22:13, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Ontario ACRs
Hey, at your earliest convenience, can you please address the comments at your ACRs? Things are starting to get backed up there. --Rschen7754 22:12, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sure thing. Been fairly busy as of late, but I should have an opportunity to examine each of them in the next day or two if my memory holds out. - Floydian τ ¢ 08:03, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Nelson Mandela
Hello so I do not want this to to go into a heated back and forth thing but for the Death and funeral section of Nelson Mandela I did the exact thing when Margret Thatcher died that day and nothing like what you are doing happened. and well I thought you were being a jerk and i was going to blast you for it, but i did read the Crystal ball section and in my mind it would be under WP:EVENT and WP:WP:NOT#JOURNALISM and not WP:CRYSTALBALL. Anyway I took a deep breath and calm down,and I also understand why you did and what you did, I do believe that either by tomorrow or in the next few days, this page will have to come back up but until we get more info i will leave it alone for now. I want to also apologize as well and no hard feelings. Nhajivandi (talk) 23:53, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- It's true. The way I see it, WP:DEADLINE is a double edged sword. It implies that there is no rush to get things done in terms of splitting content out. The other sections in Nelson Mandela's article were several paragraphs long, and to me stumbling upon the page, it seemed abruptly out of place to have the two sentence section employing WP:SUMMARYSTYLE. I've found with other notable deaths in the past year and change that "Reaction to death" sections spring up far to much and become a compendium of "In popular culture" trivia. Nothing personal against you or the other editor, but I find the rush to separate the page is only further encouragement to trivia and a list of condolences by other notable people, even if the condolences themselves aren't especially notable. Cheers, Floydian τ ¢ 01:54, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:39, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ontario Highway 17, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voyageur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)