User talk:Flyingtrapeez

Speedy deletion nomination of The Glenforest Dream Team

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on The Glenforest Dream Team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 11:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Glenforest dream team

A tag has been placed on Glenforest dream team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. _Will^dow (Talk) 11:20, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

You've asked for a week to improve your article, but it's unlikely that will be granted as there is no assertion of notability. Please have a look at WP:GNG for the general notability guidelines for Wikipedia articles, and WP:CLUB for more general notability guidelines for clubs. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 11:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but Catfish Jim is right: there is no point giving you more time because it's clear that your "dream team" is not notable enough, in Wikipedia's sense, to have an article. The WP:Welcome page and the guide to writing WP:Your first article, will tell you more about contributing to Wikipedia; the WP:List of bad article ideas is worth a read, too. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:56, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nutri-Grain, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nutri-Grain was changed by Flyingtrapeez (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-01-28T07:34:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Glenforest Secondary School. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Glenforest Secondary School was changed by Flyingtrapeez (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-01-28T07:40:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Ugly (song). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 07:52, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]