Jump to content

User talk:FlynnBytes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm Flynn. I'm new. I'm mostly interested in expanding stubs and editing biographies.

FlynnBytes, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi FlynnBytes! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlos Obregón Borrero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mito (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching this, fixed it FlynnBytes (talk) 12:09, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FlynnBytes. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nature Human Behaviour, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dom from Paris (talk) 23:17, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FlynnBytes (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Don't understand what's going on, please CheckUser FlynnBytes (talk) 21:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's obvious that you understand what happened. We do not checkuser accounts to prove innocence. Huon (talk) 21:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FlynnBytes (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand I was blocked and read the guide. How am I supposed to get unblocked then? This is totally random. Should I create a new account? FlynnBytes (talk) 22:02, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. Given your history of abuse, you are unlikely to be unblocked. You certainly won't be unblocked through this account, as it is not eligible for unblock consideration. Yamla (talk) 23:46, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's also obvious that you understand why you were blocked. No, you should not create a new account. Huon (talk) 22:12, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hells no! Do not create yet another account. Please request consideration of an unblock on your original account. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:03, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]