User talk:Flytje

License tagging for Image:195402 Margaret Scott.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:195402 Margaret Scott.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:5402_Margaret_Scott.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:5402_Margaret_Scott.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:195404 Marilyn Waltz 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:195404 Marilyn Waltz 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 17:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Playboy Playmates

I noticed you re-created the article "Dead Playboy Playmates". Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead Playboy Playmates, which shows that there was a consensus among editors to delete the page. When an article is deleted through articles for deletion, it should not be reposted. If you feel the deletion was unjustified or against policy, you may make a request for undeletion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Thank you. szyslak (t, c) 00:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of University of Alabama in Huntsville varsity tennis team Playboy controversy

I have nominated University of Alabama in Huntsville varsity tennis team Playboy controversy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Alabama in Huntsville varsity tennis team Playboy controversy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Floquenbeam (talk) 21:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, this used to be the article Roseleena Blair before a couple of page moves. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:39, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Playmates of:

Template:Playmates of: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Playboy playmate templates

Template:Playboy playmate templates has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]