Jump to content

User talk:Folklorexyz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Folklorexyz, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Folklorexyz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Path slopu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Artpop— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. PATH SLOPU 12:23, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Lil-unique1. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bionic (Christina Aguilera album) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 10:58, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The X Tour, you may be blocked from editing. Pillowdelight (talk) 00:44, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Christina Aguilera shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. © Tbhotch (en-3). 23:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]