User talk:Fulgery
Fulgery, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi Fulgery! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC) |
January 2017
[edit]![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at Ibn Tumart shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 16:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- I opened a Talk Page and made a dispute resolution request to try to resolve the conflict, and Aṭlas gave no valid reasons for deleting the content and continued reverting it. Did you also told Aṭlas to stop deleting my contribution ? Fulgery (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 17 January
[edit] Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Ibn Tumart page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
@Fulgery. Your last revert violated the WP:3RR rule on reversing edits. Since you seem to be aware of procedures on Wikipedia despite only been registered a couple days ago, I expect you know this one. If you don't, I advise you to read it carefully. I will not report you this time, but please stop edit-warring. If you're concerned about editors reading your edits, you can provide them with diffs. You do not need to reverse. The page should remain where it was before your controversial edits. Please do not reverse again. Walrasiad (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Check this out
[edit]You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Ibn Tumart#RfC: Should the article gives weight to the mahdist/sharifian claims. . Aṭlas (talk) 22:56, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Aṭlas (talk) 19:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)