User talk:GAThrawnIGF

Welcome

Recurring dreams 07:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Mara Santangelo on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I refer to this bibliotheque (Talk) 00:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian QF

Who was the last Canadian QF in an ATP event? —MC 01:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Singles Timeline in Hrbaty Article

Thanks for including the singles performance timeline in Hrbaty article. I am wondering if his career SR at US open is 0 / 12 or 0/11? I would change it, but wanted to confirm it with you first. - RC 21:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Levine

Nice job updating Jesse Levine. Might you be able to add a box? Above my skill level. Tx. --Epeefleche (talk) 03:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HelpMe

{{helpme}} Could someone explain how to send messages through Wiki? I looked in the FAQ and I didn't notice it.

Hey GAThrawnIGF! Most messages sent through wikipedia are done by editing a user talk pages like this! This is considered a message! Also, you can email uses who have allowed the function by going onto their user page and clicking 'E-mail this user'. While I'm here, don't forget to sign posts with ~~~~ so users know who, and when they are speaking to somebody. If you have anymore questions, don't hesitate in contacting me :) Tiddly-Tom 07:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Garrigues

I am currently proposing that the Garrigues page should be replaced by the content now found on the Garrigues (disambiguation) page and the the material presently on the Garrigues page should be moved to a new page to be titled Les Garrigues, Catalonia If you have the time I would appreciate your comments on the Discussion page at Garrigues. I hope you will agree. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tennis-related articles

Greetings! I see you are creating a number of tennis-related articles, and while this is commendable, I suggest that it would be best to focus on one series before moving to another. As it is, there are tremendous numbers of red-links and unfinished bits in the articles. For example, please do not place articles into categories which do not exist (and do not create categories that will only have one or two articles in them). Take note not to try and call templates that don't exist...I see at least one or two calls for a {{1994 in Tennis}} template. Also, please take the time to find some sources for these articles (news mentions, etc) so that they comply with Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. Take your time, and don't try to add everything at once, or you will overwhelm yourself with cleanup later on, and some of the articles you have worked hard to create may be deleted for not complying with policy. Please thoroughly read the links contained in the welcome message at the top of this page...they will help you tremendously in creating articles. If you have any questions, please leave a note on my talk page. Cheers! -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 18:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ASB Classic

Please, don't update the results before matches are over. --Flags-Chaser (talk) 23:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll second that LeaveSleaves (talk) 04:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Running Man Barnstar
		The running man's barnstar for your overlooked and excellent contributions to tennis on Wikipedia. I'll stamp it here and afford you the luxury of starting your userpage if/when you want. And remember, Barnstars have sharp edges.Yohan euan o4 (talk) 11:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome again

Welcome!

Hello, GAThrawnIGF, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

MBisanzBot (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Resilient Barnstar
		Got quite a few comments on here regarding overly hasty edits, and about your pursuit of quantity over quality, but given the time you've devoted (at least today) on keeping 2008 U.S. Open (tennis) updated, I think you definitely deserve this star. Great work on this page and keep it up. Gnowor (talk) 20:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions

Please source your articles with reliable sources; failure to do so could lead to the deletion of these articles as original research. Just because {{unreferenced}} is on an article doesn't mean it's okay to write totally unsourced articles and leave them. --Core desat 05:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Set tiebreaks

Hey man! You don't really need to put the number of points won during a tiebreak by the winner. The score is implied based on the score of the tie-break loser.

Match results

Can you stop editing match results before they're finished? You just did it AGAIN for the Blake-Stepanek match, editing in the result 5 minutes before it finished. And that's not even the first time I've seen you do it, so I thought I'd mention it. Jetblackheart (talk) 16:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

STOP EDITING THE SET RESULT WHEN IT HASN'T FINISHED!! You have just done it with Federer - Hrbaty at wimbledon, don't do it man! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamstatude (talk • contribs) 13:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your incomplete updates of singles performance timelines

Please refrain from doing an update if you have no intention of doing a complete update. You're creating messes that others have to clean-up, which is very irritating and unproductive. Tennis expert (talk) 19:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yuri Schukin

Could you please explain why you changed the nationality of Yuri Schukin from Russian to Kazakhstani? A ecis^Brievenbus 01:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the source. I have changed the article Yuri Schukin accordingly, and I am in the process of changing the flags in tournaments he played. Do you know when he changed nationality? A ecis^Brievenbus 21:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just came across this article from last week by Taiwanese news agency CNA. It says that "Schukin recently obtained a Kazakhstan passport..." This would mean that he still played under a Russian licence in 2007 and earlier, which means that he would get a Russian flag in tournaments prior to 2008. A ecis^Brievenbus 23:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Tennis articles

In an attempt to upgrade the quality of tennis articles, I have taken up the suggestion of adding short day-by day summaries to each of the tournament articles for 2009. I noticed you were adding results to draw pages and wondered if you would mind helping me with this (see for example this summary of Day One of the Brisbane International that I wrote yesterday. I have added titles to this effect for tournaments currently taking place (Doha, Chennai, Brisbane and Hobart - the latter of which did not have an article until yesterday and needs a lead section). Can you let me know on my talk page. Thanks. 03md (talk) 11:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Were you planning to do any of the summaries this evening? 03md (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good start to the summary of the Chennai Open. I have added a few further details to the singles paragraph - just the players that the seeds beat and scorelines. 03md (talk) 22:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have you got the time to do a review of Days 4, 5 and 6 of the the Brisbane International - I have added references under the titles. I have already written comprehensive reviews of Days 1, 2 and 3 of the tournament which you are welcome to check through. 03md (talk) 18:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you planning on doing the daily reviews for the tournaments. 03md (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Croatian tournaments

I saw you were doing the 1998 ATP Tour article and was wondering if you knew whether the Split and Zagreb tournnaments were one and the same. According to the International Series template, Split was played in 1998 and Zagreb before 1998 and then in 2006-2008 but the PBZ Zagreb Indoors article says no tournament was held from 1998 to 2006. Thanks. 03md (talk) 09:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers - I had created a redirect to PBZ Zagreb Indoors so will now create an article for Split and add a note to the Zagreb article. 03md (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

add dashes please

when adding results to 2009 ATP World Tour, please add dashes ( – ) instead of ( - ) . Thank you

Tennis summaries

Hi, I asked you a month ago about doing the summaries for tennis articles this year. User:LeaveSleaves has proposed this structure for the grand slam articles that could also be applied to regular tournaments. Would you be able to write a review (not day-by-day but a tournament summary) based on those proposals, and I will then attempt it for other articles. Let me know on my talkpage. Thanks. 03md (talk) 19:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You could start with one of the completed tournaments from last week - which article are you going to do so I can keep an eye on it? Remember to add references from ATP/WTA and other reliable websites. 03md (talk) 22:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's starting to look good. I have moved the first two sentences of the "Tournament" section back to the top so it still has a lede section - hope this is okay. I will not alter anything else until you are finished. 03md (talk) 22:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Diacritics

Hello ! You may have noticed that I have added diacritics to the players' names on the 2009 ATP World Tour article some days ago, as it seems their use is now the preferred practice in tennis articles like 2009 French Open or 2009 Wimbledon Championships - so please continue using them in you next edits on the page. Cheers ! --Don Lope (talk) 18:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note...

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have to agree, please leave a summary! When

(diff) (hist) . . 2009 Australian Open‎; 04:17 . . (+17,688) . . GAThrawnIGF (talk | contribs | block)

popped up on my watchlist I wondering how anyone could add so much to an older article, but it turned out to be very useful draw information! Keep up the good work and leave an edit summary if you can.--Commander Keane (talk) 04:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Australian Open

Hello, I am going to give you this link to do the matches if you want to, which here is the link. If you want to or not, I just don't have the time! I'll say we probably have to do the three courts Laver, Hisense, Court!TW-RF (talk) 02:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am loving your work so-far! GOOD JOB!TW-RF (talk) 21:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good Job on those six you did, I did the last three! I will work on a couple of them over the next couple of weeks if you don't want to do them. I got all the kinks fixed with the schedule of play links on the page just copy and paste it into yours!TW-RF (talk) 17:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will do day 7! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.240.44.215 (talk) 21:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will do day 10!98.240.44.215 (talk) 22:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will do day Nine(9), but I need you or someone to do day Eight(8)! PLEASE!98.240.44.215 (talk) 22:58, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I will do it to get it done!98.240.44.215 (talk) 23:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template to Use!

Day # (# January)

Seeds out:
- Men's Singles:
- Women's Singles:
- Men’s Doubles:
- Women’s Doubles:
- Mixed Doubles:

Schedule of Play

Matches on Main Courts
Matches on Rod Laver Arena
Event	Winner	Loser	Score
	[[]] vs [[]]
	[[]] vs [[]]
	[[]] vs [[]]
	[[]] vs [[]]
	[[]] vs [[]]
Matches on Hisense Arena
Event	Winner	Loser	Score
	[[]] vs [[]]
	[[]] vs [[]]
	[[]] vs [[]]
	[[]] vs [[]]
Matches on Margaret Court Arena
Event	Winner	Loser	Score
	[[]] vs [[]]
	[[]] vs [[]]
	[[]] vs [[]]
	[[]] vs [[]]
	[[]] vs [[]]
Italics Means Night Matches

User:TW-RF/Sandbox 5

Hello GAThrawnIGF, I am going to be asking a couple of users to help on this in order to get this done because it is a big task that I can't get it done all on my own quickly! Just make sure to alert people before you start on a section by putting your signnature next to section number! Thanks!TW-RF (talk) 19:41, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doubles Navbox implementation

Hello, GAThrawnIGF, Here is the links if you want to do them! I created the pages all today. Talk to you later.TW-RF (talk) 19:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

updates

Tx for all your good work on updates. Question -- I noticed that Levine is now at 94, his old high, and the infobox just reflects the first date he reached that level (previously). Is that a convention, or should we reflect both that date and the more recent date? Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tretorn +

Before you make any more mistakes look at this link please http://www.atpworldtour.com/Tournaments/Challenger/Tretorn-Serie.aspx. Now go and make the changes. Or I will. And I am NOT edit warring. Thank you KnowIG 14:17, 5 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by KnowIG (talk • contribs)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:47, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invitation

Hi GAThrawnIGF, I would like to invite you to a discussion on setting up good guidelines for tennis player notability. Please feel free to give comments and suggestions there. Thank you. Arteyu ? _{Blame it on me !} 09:17, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 ITF Women's Circuit

You have recently edited 2010 ITF Women's Circuit (July–September) so you may be interested in Talk:2010 ITF Women's Circuit#Split by months. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:11, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rafael Nadal in 2010 for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Rafael Nadal in 2010, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael Nadal in 2010 until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 02:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2011 ATP World Tour Finals

Hello there!

Unfortunately I had to revert your recent edits, since as far as I am concerned partial updates make more damage than not. "Partial" as only adding points to eliminated players thus giving them an unfair advantage and "partial" as not updating according to the criteria written in the headline (players above 300 pts). So in general you have to count all other player's results (in Challenger series as well) to see who entered as new ones to the table. My calculations show that Dmitry Tursunov, Xavier Malisse and Mikhail Youzhny will enter the following week though I am planning to level up the limit to 400 hundred to cut down the table. All things considered I must say that there's no need to update it until the end of the actual running highest tournament (because it only makes sense as daily updates do). If you want to follow the current results or see what will be added in the end of the event you can check my sandbox, which I edit regurarly. Cheers. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 10:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. There's a debate going on whether the Monte Carlo Masters is 500 OR 1000 event regarding its classification in the best 18 tournament limit (it rewards 1000 points but it was added to the 500 table last year according to the 2010 ATP Rulebook). I haven't found any information for that this year, and I guess it's because that it haven't changed. That's why I included it in the 500 coloumn and the concerning sidenote and points will show that it's still a Masters event. In its current form the table has capacity for 19 tournaments, which is wrong and misleading. What's your opinion? Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 21:09, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved. And yes it's definitely counted as one of the four 500 chances ([1])Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 09:14, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Third revert alert

Please do not put back Nicolás Almagro to 1450. He officially has 1610 per this. Instead try to help to resolve counting algorhythm on the talk page. Cheers. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 18:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Wozniacki career statistics

Please, don't update the results before matches are over.Alptns90 (talk) 15:20, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Novak Djokovic in 2011

The article Novak Djokovic in 2011 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOT#STATS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MarB4 •ɯɒɹ• 14:46, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Novak Djokovic in 2011

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Novak Djokovic in 2011, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:58, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Roger Federer tennis season

Hello there! Your recent updates of 2011 Roger Federer tennis season are not in consensus with WP:TENSCR, which stipulates that tennis scores must be documented with ndash symbols. Please familiarise yourself with this and other rules before updating tennis results in any pages. Thank you! Prayerfortheworld (talk) 01:33, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Winston-Salem Open

Hello there! Your recent updates of 2011 Winston-Salem Open are not in consensus with WP:TENSCR, which stipulates that tennis scores must be documented with ndash symbols. Note that this is the second time that I have notified you of not observing WP:TENSCR. Please do so in the future, as it contributes to the uniformity of tennis score documentation throughout Wikipedia. Thank you! Prayerfortheworld (talk) 18:52, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

Gosh - over 30,000 edits. Kudos to you :) How do you find the stamina? Do you get to play tennis as well as editing tennis articles?

Reply here if you'd like, and I'll respond here.

Best wishes, Trafford09 (talk) 21:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I never realized I had that many edits. And I usually almost always only edit tennis results & ranking changes. Yes, I religiously play and watch as well as edit. GAThrawnIGF (talk) 22:33, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Gosh - you do spend your time well! I like tennis too - prefer doubles mostly - singles is too hard work (you can't shout "yours" so easily in singles!).

Yes, you have indeed done that many edits - see here.

I think the sterling work you do on tennis is very valuable to Wikipedia.

Just a thought, though ... did you realise we're supposed to supply Edit Summaries (ESs) with our edits?

Had you thought about ESs? How do you feel about them? Regards, Trafford09 (talk) 22:49, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can see you're a person of many actions, but usually (in WP circles) little conversation. Nonetheless, there is clear evidence that you are very articulate.

Why am I harping on about ESs? Well, like many editors, I suppose, I have a lot of articles on my wp:watchlist - I expect you may have even more. And like many editors, I try to maintain the quality of those articles, by keeping tabs on their edits. If an edit's by a known (blue) editor, and has an ES (however brief), then there's a reasonable probability that the edit is sound & I can ignore it & sleep peacefully. But if not, I feel it's my (joint) responsibility to review the edit, and if necessary undo it &/or notify the editor concerned.

But why should this concern you? After all, you seem a sincere (& prolific) editor. What's in it for you, if you supply ESs? Well, like me (& I dare say more so), you have a passion for WP. You contribute to its quantity & have a care for its quality too. Very commendable. But of course it's a collaborative project, and we can all be different team members. So, while you do more than your fair share of creating articles and maintaining them, you benefit from other editors monitoring the articles & maintaining their quality, by reviewing suspect edits, yes?

So, I think that's where ESs play their valuable role for me and even indirectly you (and why, of course, consensus is to wp:ES#Always_provide_an_edit_summary).

So, you're already, as I said before, an invaluable WP editor. Won't you consider the fairly small step of supplying ESs, becoming an even more valuable and exemplary team member? After all, ESs don't need to be verbose. Single words like 'ranking' or 'result' are quick to type (or paste), and other editors know not to review such edits.

If you think my argument is unreasonable, please tell me where I may be wrong, won't you?

Best wishes, Trafford09 (talk) 10:01, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

Hi - it might be interesting to note that (completely separately from the above) I just came here to comment on your (and User:Mrf8128) lack of edit summaries at 2011 ATP World Tour Finals. I noted that someone had updated the performances of Troicki and Almargo at the US Open but no one else. Because of a lack of editing summaries, it made it very difficult to work out if this was an error, or deliberate. As Trafford09 notes above, the reason for doing it is fairly clear: Wikipedia articles are developed by a community, and it makes it much easier for others to support your many edits! --Pretty Green (talk) 12:53, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Roger Federer tennis season

Hello there! Your recent updates of 2011 Roger Federer tennis season are not in consensus with WP:TENSCR, which stipulates that tennis scores must be documented with ndash symbols (–) only. Please note that this is the third warning that I have given you regarding WP:TENSCR. Please remain consistent with WP:TENSCR in your edits and be courteous to other editors in doing so. Thank you, and happy editing! Prayerfortheworld (talk) 03:21, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Important Discussion

Hi there is a big discussion going about cutting a lot of the current tennis record related articles from 35 down to a much smaller number you are a contributor on the stats sided your thoughts would be welcome here Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tennis#Template:Years_in_tennis --Navops47 (talk) 22:14, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Roger Federer tennis season

Hello! You recently inputted some incorrect information on the match between Federer and Ryan Harrison. Please be sure that the match is completely finished before you input such information. Thanks! Prayerfortheworld (talk) 19:45, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Rafael Nadal tennis season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Farah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Radwanska

Hi. What's the source for her reaching world no. 3 on May 7? Just curious. -- James26 (talk) 04:30, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ATP number 1 ranked singles players

Hi. As per this discussion, consensus has been made stipulating that the ATP No. 1 list will be updated only when the ATP website updates their rankings. So please stop updating the rankings in advance, since WP is not a crystal ball and updating in advance constitutes original research. —Bloom6132 (talk) 05:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GAThrawnIGF, despite the message above and many, many reverts to your premature updates of the ATP and WTA number 1 ranked players articles you continue to update these articles prematurely (see [2]) and against WP:CRYSTALBALL. I have no idea why you keep disregarding this consensus (you don't seem to communicate on your Talk page) but you really need to stop doing this. Failure to do so will sooner or later end up at WP:AN/I with a likely block request for your edits on these pages. It seems silly to let it get that far. Regards, --Wolbo (talk) 00:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GAThrawnIGF, turns out this time you were right and I was incorrect in reverting your update. Hadn't noticed that the ATP had already updated the ranking on Saturday instead of Monday. --Wolbo (talk) 19:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Roger Federer tennis season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donald Young (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:41, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ATP World Tour 250 series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Moser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serena Williams career statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Na Li (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Award

	The Tennis Barnstar
	For continued excellence in maintaining the quality of tennis related articles or to those giving great assistance and time to WikiProject Tennis. Wolbo (talk) 11:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For your continuous work to keep the tennis articles up-to-date. Thanks. --Wolbo (talk) 11:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate articles

You appear to be the primary maintainer of 2013 Qatar Airways Tournament of Champions. I posted first to User talk:Popsiclesare#Duplicate articles but you may also be interested. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Citi Open, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ATP World Tour 250 series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Anderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:54, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rafael Nadal career statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rogers Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:46, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 ATP World Tour Finals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2013 US Open (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WTA International tournaments, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shuai Zhang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WTA International tournaments, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hong Kong Open (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 WTA Premier tournaments may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''{{flagicon|GER}} [[Anna-Lena Groenefeld]] {{flagicon|CZE}} [[Kveta Peschke]]''' 6–77–9), 6–4, [10–5] || {{flagicon|HUN}} [[Timea Babos]] {{flagicon|FRA}} [[Kristina Mladenovic]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:26, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 WTA Premier tournaments may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''{{flagicon|GER}} [[Anna-Lena Groenefeld]] {{flagicon|CZE}} [[Kveta Peschke]]''' 6–77–9), 6–4, [10–5] || {{flagicon|HUN}} [[Timea Babos]] {{flagicon|FRA}} [[Kristina Mladenovic]]
Williams]]''' 6–3, 6–0 || {{flagicon|FRA}} [[Alize Cornet]] ||rowspan=2| {{flagicon|USA}} [[Serena Williams {{flagicon|DEN}} [[Caroline Wozniacki]] ||rowspan=2| {{flagicon|SRB}} [[Jelena

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 ATP World Tour Finals may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

are split into two groups of four. During this stage, players compete in a round-robin format (meaning players play against all the other players in their group.
|bgcolor=#afeeee|>!---5--->[[2014 Sony Open Tennis – Men's Doubles|R16]] 90

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:03, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 ATP World Tour Finals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Harrison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 WTA Premier tournaments, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shuai Zhang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 WTA Tour Championships may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|bgcolor=#afeeee|[[2014 Aegon Classic|R16] 1

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 WTA Tour Championships may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|align="left"|flagicon|GER}} [[Julia Goerges]] {{flagicon|GER}} [[Anna-Lena Groenefeld]]
|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2015 ATP World Tour Finals

added a link pointing to Michael Venus

2015 WTA Finals

added a link pointing to Johanna Larsson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for fixing my edit. I don't know how I accidentally removed everything when I was fixing Gilles Muller point total HighSchoolMusical (talk) 00:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WTA Finals qualification points

Hi, I am contributing myself to 2015 WTA Finals and I see that a gold background for a player means she has enough points to qualify, but could 4000 points be enough? Today, Serena reached 4015 points, does that mean she has qualified? Last year the 8 qualified players where over 4000 points. Thanks for any input.

Luxembourg

Well, it's not my decision: The Road To Singapore leaderboard follows the same ranking guidelines as the WTA Rankings for singles, with one exception. Points earned from Luxembourg, an International event the week of October 19, will not factor in due to the fact that the Luxembourg final falls on a Sunday. The points will however, affect each player's ranking and qualification chances for the WTA Elite Trophy Zhuhai. http://www.wtatennis.com/news/article/5045337/title/a-numbers-game-the-rts-leaderboard Better inform yourself before starting to swear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tennistz (talk • contribs) 10:55, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 WTA Finals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qiang Wang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ATP World Tour 250 series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European Open. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 WTA Finals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chen Liang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 ATP World Tour Finals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Guccione. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GAThrawnIGF. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WTA Finals ranking

Why did you update WTA Finals Singles Ranking to 18 January, if the rankings are updated every week, there is no 18 January ranking [3].--User:Tomcat7 (talk) 21:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 ATP World Tour

Hello, please do not update points leader, until the tournament is finished, like you did in Revision as of 14:36, June 9, 2017. User:Kleyw (talk) 23:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 WTA Finals

So... again... /* Singles - @GAThrawnIGF ok smarty if you don't believe check race on wta official site http://www.wtatennis.com/rankings .. so is it 3,365 or 3,396 for Wozniacki? inform yourself before editing */ the thing that on the chart there are not seen all the tournaments Wozniacki played does not mean that she doesn't have those "unseen" tournament points counted (till she fills all 16 tournaments seen on chart, you know); because the thing is that the rankings are made of the 16 best tournaments, but if you haven't played all those most count tournaments (Majors, P.M, and two P5), their place can be replaced with those "other tournaments"; so, since Wozniacki played 15 tournaments this year, but still there are two must count tournaments that aren't played yet (US Open and Beijing), and also one more for Wozniacki since she played only one P5, and their place can be taken by those other tournaments, and Wozniacki has two more other tournaments which aren't seen in chart because she already filled other tournaments with six best. But of course those famous invisible for you 31 points will disappear when she enter those must count tournaments (first to disappear someday will be this one point for some first round loss, and then 30). That's how rankings work. So yeah how do you think the rankings work for those lower ranked who don't even play those must count tournaments? Funny, considering you, they would be like 5 more times lower ranked because they can only fill 6 best other tournaments, and then they would play but nothing would be counted. So, again, inform yourself before editing.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GAThrawnIGF. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 ATP Finals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nicolas Jarry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 ATP Finals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Venus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GAThrawnIGF. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ATP Tour 500, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Farah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 ATP Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordan Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:32, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 ATP Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nicolas Jarry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Update

Hey GAThrawnIGF, Please when you're updating infoboxes, make sure that all the information in the box is updated. I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a tennis player, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |update= parameter for stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Ugochukwu75 (talk) 05:50, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2007 Medibank International – Men's singles

The article 2007 Medibank International – Men's singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]