User talk:GMTV

The Big Breakfast

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- 9cds^(talk) 16:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Testing?

Hi GMTV. I can't tell exactly what's happening here, but either you're testing in the main article space or you're vandalising articles in small ways.

In the last couple of hours, you've materially damaged article such as Central Independent Television, ITV1, Matt Baker, Sky One and This Morning (television).

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

That way, if you're just making simple errors, we can all understand what you're trying to do and help you do it!

If you've got editing questions of any type, you can always drop me a line as I'm always happy to help new editors here at Wikipedia in any way I can and we need good editors to work on our Independent Television-related articles! Thanks! ➨ ≡Я Ξ DVΞRS≡ 19:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Id-sky-oe-1g.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Id-sky-oe-1g.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright articles

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Nigel Pickard, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/entertainment/tv_and_radio/2332843.stm. As a copyright violation, Nigel Pickard appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Nigel Pickard has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Nigel Pickard. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Nigel Pickard, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

➨ ≡Я Ξ DVΞRS≡

Image copyright problem with Image:Itv1itvproductionsendcapitv.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Itv1itvproductionsendcapitv.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ➨ ≡Я Ξ DVΞRS≡ 15:57, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing warning tags from images

Do not remove the warning tags from images that have no source or copyright information. Removing such tags, as you did with Image:Itv1itvproductionsendcapitv.jpg and Image:Id-sky-oe-1g.jpg is considered to be vandalism, which can result in you being blocked from editing. If you are not prepared to provide the copyright and source information that Wikipedia requires for legal reasons, then please ask someone to delete the image for you instead. Thank you. ➨ ≡Я Ξ DVΞRS≡ 21:27, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Id-sky-one-1g.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Id-sky-one-1g.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Id-sky-one-1h.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Id-sky-one-1h.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:58, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday Morning TV in the UK

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Saturday Morning TV in the UK article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Billy H 15:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Akinbola

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. (aeropagitica) (talk) 12:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The WB Television Network / UPN

Please be aware that UPN and The WB are still open, and will be until The CW launches. Keep this in mind before making further edits to these articles. Thank you for your understanding. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving "ITV" to "Independent Television"

Independent Television is no longer a name used to describe this network; ITV is now the official name as it can no longer be described as totally "Independent". Please do not move articles like this again without consulting the talk page or actually understanding the article you are moving. Administrators will be made known of any further irrelavent moves like this, and irrelavent moves will be reverted by them. This is the third time I have witnessed an irrelavent article/action made by you. Marbles333 11:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid (TV channel)

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Stupid (TV channel), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Stupid (TV channel). You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. tgheretford (talk) 23:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jez Edwards

The article Jez Edwards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable TV presenter. Not enough reliable sources from which to write any kind of biography.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin (talk) 03:24, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello GMTV! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 277 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Kevin Duala - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]