User talk:HSLJN ZKRJNV

September 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Cahk. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of wars involving Kazakhstan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cahk (talk) 08:59, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the content because it is false information, even in the sources themselves to which the one who wrote this content referred, they say that there was no uprising, there were only small rallies, and there was no deportation of 2 million Russians, the same sources say that the participants of the rally were simply fined, check for yourself, and please unblock my HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 08:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of wars involving Kazakhstan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 13:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the content because it is false information, even in the sources themselves to which the one who wrote this content referred, they say that there was no uprising, there were only small rallies, and there was no deportation of 2 million Russians, the same sources say that the participants of the rally were simply fined, check for yourself, and please unblock me HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 08:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot I realized what I did wrong by removing the content while not writing the reason, the reason actually is: Russian uprisings in the West and North of Kazakhstan this is a complete lie, even in the sources themselves, which the one who wrote this content referred to, it says that there was no uprising and deportation of 2 million Russians, you can check everything yourself, please delete this content, and unblock me HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 09:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You must make another unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 09:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla I knew that in Wikipedia could block participants, but i didn't know that you have to write a reason for editing, i'm sorry, i'm just a beginner, i am also the author of several articles in Russian i am not a spamer, i'll take this into I, in further editing i'll write a reason, how else can i prove that i realized that I was not right? HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 12:01, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla I understand you well, i will not make any more requests, i was wrong, but i ask you to give me at least the opportunity to watch the editing of the articles' code, it is very necessary for me to translate articles into Russian, i won't edit it HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 14:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@LuK3 Hi! I ask for an explanation about editing without explanation, i'm just a beginner, i'm not a vandal, i also translate articles into Russian, please give me at least the opportunity to see the editing of the code of articles, i realized my mistake, i will write the reason in the future editing HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 19:39, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll forgive you unlock me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HSLJN ZKRJNV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will no longer make edits for no reason HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 08:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

But you did have a reason, as I can read above. If you understand why those edits were disruptive, please tell us what that is, and all describe the productive edits you wish to make. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:45, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HSLJN ZKRJNV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I realized what I did wrong by removing the content while not writing the reason, the reason actually is: Russian uprisings in the West and North of Kazakhstan this is a complete lie, even in the sources themselves, which the one who wrote this content referred to, it says that there was no uprising and deportation of 2 million Russians, you can check everything yourself, please delete this content, and unblock me HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 09:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HSLJN ZKRJNV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What should i do to be unblocked? I realized my mistake and in the future I will write the reason, i am not a spammer HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 13:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Stop making multiple simultaneous unblock requests. It's abusive and raises severe concerns of WP:CIR around your abilities. Yamla (talk) 13:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HSLJN ZKRJNV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I knew that in Wikipedia could block participants, but i didn't know that you have to write a reason for editing, i'm sorry, i'm just a beginner, i am also the author of several articles in Russian Wikipedia, i am not a spamer, i'll take this into I, in further editing i'll write a reason, how else can i prove that i realized that I was not right? HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 21:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per discussion with Yamla below, and revoking talk page access since it's clear we're all wasting our time. Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 21:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HSLJN ZKRJNV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry, i was a beginner, i didn't know that it was necessary to write the reason for editing, next time i will write the reason before editing, i realized my mistake, i'm not a vandal, i'm just a beginner, please unblock me or at least let me see the article editing code, or tell me for how long i'm blocked

HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 22:36, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is already an open unblock request above. I will close this one for you. SQL ^{Query Me!} 16:46, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 22:36, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's very clear you lack sufficient competance to follow simple directions. I strongly advise the next reviewing admin to revoke talk page access to prevent any further time-wasting here. --Yamla (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At least tell me how long i'm blocked? HSLJN ZKRJNV (talk) 23:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your block is indefinite. It will not expire. The only possibility is for you to successfully contest your block and you've worked hard to demonstrate yourself incapable of doing that. --Yamla (talk) 23:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 06:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]