User talk:Hannaharlia

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Centre for Women, Ageing and Media (WAM)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Centre for Women, Ageing and Media (WAM), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://insight.glos.ac.uk/RESEARCHMAINPAGE/CENTRES/WAM/Pages/default.aspx.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:10, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hannaharlia, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Hannaharlia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Slovenliness[edit]

How many Wikipedia articles had you looked at before you created yours? Have you any concept of encyclopedic style? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:12, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

Please note as well that it's not sufficient to claim on an article's talk page that you have the necessary copyright permissions to copy and redistribute the content in question — if we haven't explicitly been given the proper copyright permissions to retain the copied content, then it's still a copyright violation that still has to be deleted regardless of what rights you claim to have.

And even if the necessary permissions were filed, the article would still have to be rewritten for conformity with our content policies around neutral point of view and the use of reliable, independent sourcing — so even if you did file the proper copyright permissions, it would be kind of a moot point as the article would still have to be significantly revised away from the copyrighted version anyway. Bearcat (talk) 18:32, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]