Jump to content

User talk:Hariboneagle927/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 < Archive 4    Archive 5   
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  5 -  ... (up to 100)


Haribon

Who are you? Curious. Coz you're using his call sign. Lorenzeroe (talk) 11:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by call sign? Based from your editing history alone, you mean military call sign of Lt. Ferdinand Marcelino? Nah, I'm just a civilian youth with penchants for Philippine eagles or in vernacular the haribon. No way connected to him in anyway and just knew about him recently by name, in the news. By the way welcome to Wikipedia.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Homecoming of Pia Wurtzbach and state visit of Emperor Akihito and Empress Michiko

Some major events in the Philippines like the homecoming of Pia Wurtzbach and the state visit of Emperor Akihito and Empress Michiko are not on 2016 in the Philippines. Why not to add them there? Are they on the scope of the persons mentioned instead of the Philippines, or on another sub-article of 2016 in the Philippines.--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 16:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can an article named Homecoming of Pia Wurtzbach be added as the homecoming is heavily covered and presumed notable for cultural significance, like the motorcade, where many people, like workers and students, tried to get close during the procession?--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not confident with Pia Wurtzbach's homecoming. Sure it was widely covered by the press but I don't think it merits an entry there. It has been WP:ROUTINE for Filipinos to organize a homecoming for Filipinos who achieve abroad in international competition. For example, we shouldn't list every homecoming celebrations everytime Manny Pacquiao returns from his fight. Even the press got tired from this routine and doesn't cover his more recent homecomings that much. I guess that goes to 2016 in Philippine television since it may qualify as achievement in Philippine television for the coverage.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 04:09, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As for the Emperor's visit, by consensus head of states visits are not assumed to be notable unless there is a landmark treaty or agreement resulting from such visits (eg. the Emperor announces a deal to compensate WWII sex slaves; excluding routine expressions of remorse. Or a Million dollar deal of a project to be built or funded by Japanese aid.) If we automatically add head of state visits to the Years in the Philippines article take not of this hypothetical scenario:
The King of Bhutan made a brief diplomatic visit to the Philippines met with Aquino in April 11, 2016 having just making a diplomatic visit to Japan days earlier. This is the first time for head of state from Bhutan to visit with the King and Aquino coming up with a memorandum of understanding promising the improvement of relations and trade in the near future. Aquino talked about the king regarding sending of OFW's in Bhutan.
Russian President Vladimir Putin made a 5-day visit to the Philippines in March 2016. Aquino and Putin managed to secure a billion peso deal where Russia will build the Philippines its first submarine. Aquino also announces a labor deal allowing 150,000 Filipinos to work in Russia in the engineering industry near the Moscow area and in the Russian Far East.
Under this scenario, the Russian visit had more tangible results and the Bhutanese visit was just a visit or "fruitful" in diplospeak. The Russian visit should be included while the Bhutanese visit shouldn't despite being the first for a head of state of Bhutan. Not because Russia is a major power and Bhutan is a minor one. We should weigh if the visits resulted to a landmark tangible deal.

So if Obama dropped by in the Philippines for a day on his way to a visit to let's say Brunei and only managed to come up with a memorandum of understanding reiterating opposition to China's actions in the South China Sea. It still shouldn't be included even though the United States is widely considered a superpower because the visit did not result to something remarkable.The Japanese Emperor's visit should be briefly mentioned in the Japan-Philippines Relations though.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 04:09, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The homecoming of Pia Wurtzabch would be in 2016 in Philippine television, as it is heavily covered by the media. Can it is possible to be added?--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 04:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but you should mention the tv networks involved just to be clear. Also I checked List of Philippine television specials aired in 2016, its listed there too, at least ABS-CBN's coverage. Although these are uncited.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 05:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies involving the MRT-3

I still do not see major changes on the MRT-3 article, like controversies, like those ones involving MRT-3's maintenance provider and Al Vitangcol, who resigned. I added a to-do to its talk page to add a controversy section, but still not done. Can you add them?--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 04:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I got the latest news related to the controversies on the MRT-3. DOTC secretary Jun Abaya has cases because of failing to maintain the MRT-3 in proper operation, resulting to many incidents, like broken rails and problems of the vehicles. Looks like you must add this newest info.--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 10:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2009 and 2010 in the Philippines: Jason Ivler cases missing on those articles

These articles, 2009 in the Philippines and 2010 in the Philippines lack the events related to the Jason Ivler road rage cases, which is notable on those years. Are they removed from those articles or completely missing?--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 11:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not aware if events revolving the case were placed but I am sure that these are ultimately a minor case only. This case has no difference at all to other road rage incidents. It just happens the Ivler case was widely covered because he is related to a celebrity. This has no national significance at all, although was talked about by many people.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Hariboneagle927. You have new messages at Oripaypaykim's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK nomination of Diwata-1

Hello! Your submission of Diwata-1 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jolly Ω Janner 05:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to La Union may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[File:Courts513.JPG|thumbnail|''Bulwagan ng Katarungan'' (Regional Trial Courts, in [[San Fernando, La Union|San Fernando]]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Effects of 2015-2016 El Niño on Mindanao

I still do not see any entry on 2016 in the Philippines regarding the effects of El Niño in Mindanao. State of calamity has been declared on Maguindanao, but still has no entry. Can it be added?--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 10:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I guess, since a state of calamity has been declared which is an indicator of the gravity of the situationHariboneagle927 (talk) 10:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Drought has been affecting rivers and rice fields, and many have dried up completely, destroying crops and affecting irrigation. That contributed to a state of calamity declared to aid residents affected by El Niño.--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 13:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't oppose for its inclusion. To clarify my previous statement.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 13:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Add it, for now, just with a reliable source (i.e. news). It would be as the El Niño also has a national-level impact in the Philippines, not just on Maguindanao.--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 13:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Still not added. I did not saw any changes on 2016 in the Philippines related to El Niño. I think this is not of national scope, but of local scope. Is this correct?--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I can't add all events myself, you may actually add it yourself if you can under WP:BOLD, if I or any other editor disagree they may revert it and leave some comments on the summary, then it that's the time a discussion is advised to be made if there are disagreements. Go for it, you don't need to ask me every time an edit isn't done yet. I may be a little strict when it comes to quality of the "X in the Philippines" articles due to some user, who refuse to discuss disputes and continues to add non-notable events against consensus but ultimately the article is not mine but the community. I make some mistakes too from time to time.
To answer your question, I guess the Maguindanao situation it's more of a local scope. The state of calamity clause is more of a guideline more than a rule. Unlike typhoons, the effects of droughts are more gradual. Also these droughts tend to be longer, months. It make take some time to determine if these have WP:LASTING impact or not.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The people in Maguindanao are now eating other crops because rice crops are destroyed. It may deem notability, but can that one be?
Another possibility is to add this on a section on the 2014–16 El Niño event article, with the Philippines heading instead or add that on both articles (2016 in the Philippines and 2014–16 El Niño event.--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 11:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you think so go for it. Add them to both.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I added them now, including Maguindanao, which I not listed on my last reply. I added info of the impact of the 2014-2016 El Niño, which have impact on the Philippines not included when I viewed it for the first time. I will add the effect of El Niño on Maguindanao on 2016 in the Philippines, at least.--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 15:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Diwata-1

Allen3 talk 00:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PiliPinas Debates 2016 has been nominated for Did You Know

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hariboneagle927/Archive_5&oldid=1038753194"