User talk:Harmelin67

Welcome!

Hello, Harmelin67, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! VViking_TalkEdits 04:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --VViking_TalkEdits 04:31, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at 9/11 Truth movement.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 04:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 9/11 Truth movement. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. 🖉←} 04:54, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 9/11 Truth movement, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 07:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. What does "flatearther", a rediculous scientific claim, have to do with me asking you to seriously consider my sources about 9/11? Research shows that the buildings were demolished, and thousands of professionals agree. As I have given you sources on. So why do you say you have "spoken with some engineers" about this? Why not listen to actual professionals that have look at the evidence for CD? Remember Wikipedia is all about to bring the most accurate and updated information to people that want to learn about this day. Harmelin67 (talk) 09:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

9/11

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harmelin67 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My sources are supporting my claims

Decline reason:

You did not provide any sources. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Harmelin67 (talk) 09:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harmelin67, you may want to read the Wikipedia pages about reliable sources] [WP:NPOV|on what NPOV means here (especially the section on Due and undue weight) and WP:FRINGE. That may help you understand why your edits are continuing to be reverted and will continue to be reverted so long as the overwhelming predominant view about the 9/11 attack disagrees with the "9/11 Truth Movement" view. Ravensfire (talk) 14:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]