User talk:Hatster301

Welcome!

Hello, Hatster301! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - 2/0 (cont.) 20:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Felinae appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 06:47, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, my mistake. I had noticed that "Felinae" wasn't listed on the "housecat" WP article, and thus presumed that they weren't included in Felinae (which seemed strange in retrospect). I guess I should have been a little more thorough. Sorry for the confusion. -Hatster301 (talk) 16:19, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trillion.

Hi Hatster301, thank you for the enlightenment concerning trillion. I would like you to have a look at the Trillion article, as it's misleading. Do you think that the 10^18 should be deleted? Forasmuch as it's only bilingual English-speaking countries which use long scale; in French (Canada), Afrikaans (South Africa) and Spanish (Puerto Rico). The Trillion article claims that trillion can denote 10^18 in English. --Regards, Necessary Evil (talk) 01:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not deleted outright, but perhaps amended to clarify that the "long scale" (10^18) meaning is outdated, and that "trillion" almost always refers to 10^12 in modern English-language contexts. - Hatster301 (talk) 01:46, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers game

Hello, I'm Hirolovesswords. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Numbers game. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 06:37, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you not read the edit summary? It had nothing to do with censorship or offensiveness; the problem is that the only supplied reference is from more than 60 years ago (1949 if I'm not mistaken), and therefore most likely inaccurate today.

If you can find a (much) more current reference to the information, then by all means, present it, and it can probably be included without issue. Otherwise, you keep adding incorrect information to the opening paragraph that is outdated by more than half a century.

When you revert changes from other editors, it's important to read the edit summary to understand why the change was made, instead of just assuming the reason without reading it. Making (or undoing) edits based on unverified assumptions stands contrary to the very nature of Wikipedia, don't you think? -- Hatster301 (talk) 06:46, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As much as I hate to say it, a Google search of the term finds a variety of current and relevant references that could be added if you really think it's necessary to add any more weight to it. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 07:05, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]