User talk:Hern76

Please also see WP:WELCOME

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi, Hern76 ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. These links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Section was added out of chronological sequence. FeatherPluma (talk) 07:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page United States Coast Guard Air Stations worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Natalie (talk) 17:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:Los Angeles patch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Los Angeles patch.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roberto Garcia Orozco

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Roberto Garcia Orozco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. 5hin3 (talk) 01:37, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited List of football referees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hector Martinez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discusion on an article you started

An article you edited is being considered for deletion. Please see the discussion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of football referees
Jrcrin001 (talk) 17:10, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of association football referees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juan Guzman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of association football referees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Anderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of association football referees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul McLaughlin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1994 Rose Bowl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arcadia High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harbor–UCLA Medical Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catalina Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1991 Rose Bowl may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] and the 1990-91 Tournament of Roses President Roy L. Coats. Members of the Royal Court are: (Queen Cara Rullman, San Marino, [[San Marino High School]], the Royal Court (Princesses Dawn Gray,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:08, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1990 Rose Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to South Pasadena, Arcadia High School and La Canada

1996 Rose Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Blair High School and Arcadia High School

2000 Rose Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Pasadena and Arcadia High School

2004 Rose Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to La Salle High School and Arcadia High School

1992 Rose Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pasadena

1994 Rose Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to South Pasadena

1998 Rose Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blair High School

2003 Rose Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to La Salle High School

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2004 Rose Bowl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Salle High School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of CHiPs episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Deacon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of association football referees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Farkas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from FBI Los Angeles Field Office. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 22:01, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FBI Los Angeles Field Office

Hi Hern76, given an absence of adequate referencing and a topic that can probably be accommodated in an existing article, I respectfully suggest that FBI Los Angeles Field Office should be merged with WP:redirect to List of FBI field offices. I welcome any input you may have; if so, please do so at the talk page for FBI Los Angeles Field Office. Subject to policy-based editor feedback, including any viewpoint you may provide, and to any properly referenced notable content that is added, I tentatively project making the proposed merger in 3 to 5 days. FeatherPluma (talk) 22:48, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hern76: It looks like you are trying to add article content to enhance the article. It would be very good if you were to help by providing references for your additions. I added a {{Friendly search suggestions}} template tool to the Talk page to help you with that, although you probably also have other sources you need to be providing as you add content. Thanks, and Happy Editing ! FeatherPluma (talk) 22:57, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hern76, I imagine you have very good sources for your additions. However, if you refuse to add references despite nice requests the content will need to be redacted per policy. Please consult WP:V and WP:RS if further assistance is needed. Also, there are a number a help sources including Wikipedia:Teahouse - you can get help by asking questions about how to do things properly. The essence of this message is a polite request to please add your sources. I am not picking on you personally, just asking very nicely for you to do the right thing. I am not going to remind you again, and this does not need further discussion. By the way, I notice that you may not have initially received a warm WP:WELCOME and I would very much like to extend that to you now. I am also going to take the liberty of adding you to the Love Cabal and so you will see a heart at the top of your page here - please feel free to remove this if you like. Thank you. FeatherPluma (talk) 23:14, 20 June 2015 (UTC) Updated FeatherPluma (talk) 00:23, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hern76:, The Wikipedia community has endless patience for people who are gradually learning the various procedures here. That patience even extends all the way up the ladder through the additional scrutiny that gets involved when an editor flaunts policy, all the way to getting blocked. I advise you to pay attention to the repeated polite requests for referencing your content additions. This has been made clear both here and in the article's redaction edit summaries. If you insist on flaunting policy, all unreferenced content is going to be redacted, sorry. Furthermore, any such unreferenced material will clearly constitute nonconstructive editing and from this point on will be immediately reported, as well as posted on this page. Thank you very much for taking this advice into consideration going forward. There are of course no hard feelings if you decide to respect this core policy (consult the above linked content if you have need of any clarification). FeatherPluma (talk) 20:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to FBI Los Angeles Field Office, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 22:49, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to FBI Los Angeles Field Office, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 22:58, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced content, as you did to FBI Los Angeles Field Office . This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. There are of course no hard feelings at all if you decide to respect this core policy. Consult the above linked content if you have need of any clarification. FeatherPluma (talk) 20:20, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources request / offer of assistance

@Hern76: The wp:merge with wp:redirect is now due. But I want to be as open as possible to working with you collaboratively. So I am going to extend the arbitrary timeline by another 48-72 hours, so that you can add any sources from which you derived your content additions. If you are unsure of how to do this but have sources, just type them up here, or on the article's Talk page, and I will be very pleased to format them for you. FeatherPluma (talk) 23:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at FBI Los Angeles Field Office. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:57, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Apriestofgix. I noticed that you made a change to an article, La Canada High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Thanks! Apriestofgix (talk) 21:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hern76. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Love Boat guest stars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medical Center. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hern76. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hern76. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miguel Ángel Flores Rodríguez

The article Miguel Ángel Flores Rodríguez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

coverage of him seems quite insignificant; best sources I could find were [1] [2] [3]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 18:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]