User talk:Hide&Reason
|
Australian wine
[edit]Hi. Australian wine has been selected as the current Australian collaboration, so as you voted for it, any contributions would be welcome. Thanks. --Scott Davis Talk 15:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Policy
[edit]To encourage anonymous persons to register. I find it very insulting being asked to debate with IP addresses. Adam 01:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request
[edit]This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 21:29, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
You have removed the panoramic image of Melbourne/Southbank twice, both times without justification. It is a featured picture and one of the better images in the article and I feel (somewhat subjectively) that it should remain. In future, could you discuss it on the article talk page as I feel have been, at times, a bit liberal with your removal of content. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 09:16, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- I mentioned the removal here: Talk:Melbourne#Photos
- Diliff, there was a panorama of the city skyline from the Docklands (a featured photo of yours) which I transferred to the top of the article. I thought something really professional should come at the start, but that's since been reverted to the previous skyline shot, from the Yarra.
- Melbourne#Geography already contained about three pics in addition to your own panorama. I found the metro map and the birds-eye image were more informative to that section. Your photo's superb, but it doesn't really tell users anything. It may well suit another part of the article; it may even find a home where you've put it if the section were expanded so that three/four pics wouldn't spell clutter. I'm not excluding your work, but I think sticking in photos like post-it notes for a later editorial change is a bit rich. I realise I should have put all this in the edit summary, though. Hide&Reason 10:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I was just being bold and putting it back in. I do agree that the image in question doesn't 'tell a story' but it does show the CBD/Yarra River/Southbank areas in relation to each other, which is pretty important for the geography of the city. If anything, the aerial image from the Rialto is one of the poorer images of the city in the article, since it misses so much of the skyline and doesn't really show anything other than a random scattering of buildings - its difficult to get a sense of scale. I suppose there are pro's and con's to either image but I do agree with you that we needed more images of around Melbourne as well as the skyline itself. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 13:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Unilateral removal of the history section in ABC article
[edit]Hi H&R
We have an unpleasant situation about to develop over this action by one "cyberjunkie" ("cj"), who decided all of a sudden that he'd move the entire History section of the ABC article to a new daughter article, without replacing it with a summary. The history section was almost entirely written more than a year ago.
Since this action on 12 September, the section has languished with no text at all under its title, save a link to the daughter article.The action has, in effect, gutted the article, leaving what appear to be insubstantial fragments without a core. It's must be odd to the newcomer to be denied a summary of the history and to move straight onto a chunky section on "funding and relationship with government" without knowing where how the institution arose.
Now, it's not that I disagree with him that the History section was written in greater detail than you'd normally expect in summary style. (A related issue is that the rest of the article may need to be fleshed out in the opposite direction to achieve satisfactory summary coverage of the topic—perhaps the optimal balance needs to be debated on the talk page.) What I do object to is
- (1) his failure to raise the matter on the talk page beforehand, and
- (2) provide replacement text with the summary style that he's using as his stated rationale for the removal.
The edit comment for the removal was "split (will summarise later)", whereas I'd have been pleased to see a summary written before the removal, for immediate replacement.
I've raised the matter on the talk page, and Cyberjunkie has responded negatively:
I think a total blank is worse than a long history. Please create a summary soon. Your action has resulted in damage to the overall article, IMV. Tony 11:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Whereas, I disagree. --cj | talk 12:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I can see that this is getting nowhere. I wonder whether you agree that he should either undertake to write a summary section in the near future (I suggest three or four paragraphs) or reinstate the text and raise the issue on the talk page.
I'd appreciate knowing your opinion. The ABC's talk page is here. Tony 13:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Australian Collaboration of the fortnight
[edit]Hi. You voted for Australian Broadcasting Corporation as Australian Collaboration. It has been selected, so please help to improve it in any way you can. Scott Davis Talk 13:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey
[edit]- I beg to differ. There are a lot of things about your game you could address, not least of all your spelling, etiquette and the POV penchant for Serb/Croat topics. And no offence, but dropping the AIMspeak may improve your editorial credibility. Hide&Reason 04:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yep. No worries, mate; whatever you say. Hide&Reason 10:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Hide&Reason, thank you for your crucial vote in supporting Palm Island to become the Collaboration, many edits have already been made and a sub article for the Bwgcolman people has also being created, to get things started I have created a to do list for this collaboration which I invite you to edit and add to as you like. Thanks, WikiTownsvillian 02:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hi again Hide&REason, is there anything I can say to convince you to jump on board? only a week left but already a huge amount has been done at the Palm Island article :) sorry for bugging you, WikiTownsvillian 14:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Gday. I'll have a look at it when stuff's more or less settled down; at the moment work's been shitting me. Hide&Reason 14:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- No probs, thanks for your reply. WikiTownsvillian 00:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Bh_arcanum_rec_session.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bh_arcanum_rec_session.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 09:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Australia newsletter
[edit]WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC).
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arc silentfilm intro.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Arc silentfilm intro.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kim cover.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Kim cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Australia newsletter
[edit]WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC).
Just created the page for Adam Roberts' second novel. Thought you might like to know. mike40033 (talk) 03:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Image:Don Chipp portrait - National Library of Australia.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Don Chipp portrait - National Library of Australia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 13:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008
[edit]The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:26, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
[edit]I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Fair Use in Australia discussion
[edit]As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery