User talk:Historiadormundo/Archive A

Welcome!

Hello, Historiador1923, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Luis Pareto González, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Piguy101 (talk) 01:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Luis Pareto González

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Luis Pareto González requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Piguy101 (talk) 01:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Último mensaje

No parece de profesional escribir con tantas faltas de ortografía. Pero bueno. Te reitero que yo no borré tus imagenes, lo hizo un administrador de Commons porque estabas incumpliendo con las reglas de ese sitio. Subiste reiteradamente violaciones a los derechos de autor. La ley de derechos de propiedad intelectual chilena pide incluso para las imagenes en dominio público que se acredite el autor y la fuente. En fín, espero leas tu discusión en Commons. Sobre el artículo, yo te dije que lo revisaría, cumplí con eso, pero no que corregiría tus faltas de redacción. Eso no es de un profesional, ¿eh? Este será el último mensaje que te dirigiré. Y si insistes en dejarme mensajes, te reportaré a los administradores por harassing. Saludos cordiales, Küñall (talk) 01:26, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at Fernando Errázuriz. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please don't add content that is poorly written in English-language. Küñall (talk) 05:01, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mifter (talk) 00:28, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You and Küñall appear to be edit warring over some additions you are trying to make to Fernando Errázuriz. Simply undoing each without discussing the changes is likely to get both of you blocked or the article protected. You both need to discuss the changes to the article on the articles talk page to reach an agreement. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to let me know. Best, Mifter (talk) 00:49, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mireya Baltra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deputy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eugenio Cruz Vargas

The article Eugenio Cruz Vargas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is largely unreferenced. Several sources are unreliable (Scribd, Angelfire, Blogspot), and 'major' source El Mercurio only makes minor mentions of Cruz Vargas.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on Talk:Eugenio Cruz Vargas|the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Diego Grez (talk) 04:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ricardo Yrarrázaval Larraín

The article Ricardo Yrarrázaval Larraín has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. StudiesWorld (talk) 23:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara

The article Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable individual. MCNBiografias is not reliable, and the only other accesible source is the Library of the Chilean Congress, which is a catalog entry for a book of Cruz, but that does not make him notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on Talk:Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara|the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Diego Grez (talk) 05:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez (talk) 01:02, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ricardo Yrarrázaval Larraín for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ricardo Yrarrázaval Larraín is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Yrarrázaval Larraín until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez (talk) 01:03, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pedro Olmos Muñoz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pedro Olmos Muñoz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Olmos Muñoz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez (talk) 01:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eugenio Cruz Vargas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eugenio Cruz Vargas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugenio Cruz Vargas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez (talk) 14:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adriana Valdés for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adriana Valdés is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adriana Valdés until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez (talk) 02:10, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Referencias

Historiador, los nombres de los libros, articulos, instituciones, autores, u otros, que estén en español, no debes traducirlos al inglés al usarlos como referencia. Debes usar los nombres originales. Las fechas, sí deben traducirse. Diego Grez (talk) 17:05, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Historiador1923, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Diego Grez (talk) 05:37, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for sockpuppetry

It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:37, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pedro Olmos Muñoz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pedro Olmos Muñoz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Olmos Muñoz (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez (talk) 01:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adriana Valdés for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adriana Valdés is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adriana Valdés (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Manuel Rengifo

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Manuel Rengifo, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.myetymology.com/encyclopedia/Manuel_Rengifo.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manuel Rengifo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mendoza. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nombres traducidos

Hola Historiador. Acabo de ver la edición que hiciste en Eugenio Cruz, y venía a informarte que no es necesario traducir los nombres de los trabajos. "The only time I lie" debe ser reemplazado por su nombre en español ("La única vez que miento"?), y así sucesivamente. Si quieres, puedes colocar las traducciones al inglés entre paréntesis y entre comillas, pero siempre debe ir el nombre en el idioma original. Saludos, Diego Grez (talk) 06:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pedro Olmos Muñoz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linares. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vergara family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vasco. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:24, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Please note that the image you are trying to add to the ECV article has been deleted on Commons, [1], as a copyright violation. It is not a good idea to edit war over inserting a red linked image. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:41, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear CambridgeBayWeather Thanks for the clarification, best regard --Historiador1923 (talk) 19:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on E. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:43, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear CambridgeBayWeather Thanks for the clarification, best regard --Historiador1923 (talk) 18:59, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Jac16888 ^Talk 17:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC) Ok , thanks you User talk:Jac16888[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cruz Family

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cruz Family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by Cruz Family|visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 00:44, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Cruz Family. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's Talk:Cruz Family|talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 01:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]