User talk:HistoryGuy94

September 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Ku Klux Klan, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 01:16, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not disruptive editing, you fucking idiot. Look into it yourself. -HistoryGuy94 (talk) 01:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 01:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpages aren't fora to advance your own personal misconceptions over extensively sourced content based on reliable sources. You also don't get to attack other editors when they tell you to stop doing that. Acroterion (talk) 01:23, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I deeply apologize for saying that to you. -HistoryGuy94 (talk) 01:28, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’d like to apologize. -HistoryGuy94 (talk) 02:06, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I accept your apology. However, to be unblocked I think you're going to need to exhibit a little more introspection than a 10-minute turn-around from anger to contrition. I'll leave the judgment to another admin. Acroterion (talk) 02:34, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that. I have mood swings sometimes. I know that's not an excuse. I was raised in the Deep South where conservatism takes priority. Are conservatives welcome here? -HistoryGuy94 (talk) 02:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We do have religious conservatives of various types, and a couple of political conservatives. But keep in mind that Wikipedia:Civility is a matter of policy. Dimadick (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HistoryGuy94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is no longer necessary, as I have learned not to disrespect other editors and will not disrupt any talk pages or pages for that matter any longer. Thank you. HistoryGuy94 (talk) 01:35, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm also skeptical that you had this sea change within such a short period of time. I might have removed the block if you indicated a willingness to stay away from political topics and edit in less controversial areas. 331dot (talk) 08:04, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HistoryGuy94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is no longer necessary, as I have completely learned not to disrespect other editors and admins. If unblocked early, I intend on making useful contributions in the field of less-controversial historical research. Thank you. HistoryGuy94 (talk) 12:59, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have demonstrated you are incapable of editing appropriately in that general subject area. Yamla (talk) 13:10, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have a history degree. -HistoryGuy94 (talk) 13:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant. I can, for instance, point to people with a medical degree who have spouted nonsense about Covid. Doug Weller talk 15:05, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with you. The facts aren’t on your side, but okay. -HistoryGuy94 (talk) 15:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HistoryGuy94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is no longer necessary, as I have since learned that personal attacks aren't okay. If unblocked early, I will focus my contributions on poetry and literature articles, as well as individuals who have delved in that subject--both in the past and now. Thank you. -HistoryGuy94 (talk) 15:53, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppet of User:SteKelBry. Now indefinitely blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why have I been indefinitely blocked? -HistoryGuy94 (talk) 01:33, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See the Decline reason immediately above. Largoplazo (talk) 01:55, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not User:SteKelBry. -HistoryGuy94 (talk) 02:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what's going on, but I am not the user that I have been claimed to be. -HistoryGuy94 (talk) 01:12, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HistoryGuy94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not sure why my block was extended from 31 hours to indefinite. I did nothing wrong and thought I would have a brighter future here. If that is still possible, if unblocked, I will focus on sports history—particularly football history. Thank you. -HistoryGuy94 (talk) 21:27, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted above, and as you have already been reminded, you are now confirmed as a sockpuppet account, hence the indefinite block. So what you would do if unblocked is irrelevant. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:16, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not Stekelbry. I'm not sure who thought I was, but I'm not. I have never had any other account except for this one. -HistoryGuy94 (talk) 20:08, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HistoryGuy94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to apologize for spewing alt-right propaganda here. If unblocked, I will make useful contributions in the field of history. HistoryGuy94 (talk) 15:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below, no need for two open requests Girth Summit _(blether) 11:15, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HistoryGuy94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is no longer necessary, as I have read all of the rules and guidelines. I’m fully ready to make useful contributions in the field of literature if given the chance to be unblocked. Thank you. HistoryGuy94 (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

My use of the CU tool confirms that you have been evading your block. I am also revoking talk page access. Girth Summit _(blether) 11:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.