Jump to content

User talk:Honzula

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Honzula, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Lysytalk 19:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Czech Republic (based on your article Otakar Jaros)

[edit]

≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 10:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be uncivil

[edit]

Please beware of being uncivil in your comments to other editors as you showed while editin Otakar Jaroš army group (this was joke?). ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 23:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your wishes are irrelevant. You might wish whatever you want, but never ever beat anyone for editing articles with good faith. You are not the wisest of the world, so calm down immediately. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 23:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first foreign Hero of the Soviet Union

[edit]

Sure, it was Italian P. Gibelli and Bulgarian V.S. Goranov (both since 31 December 1936). See here.--Pethr 22:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong, it was Otakar Jaros, check this [1] ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 22:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I might be wrong but find some other source. This one seems inaccurate - doesn't include pre-1938 honors.--Pethr 23:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It seems he was first in the WW2 only, I fixed it at WP:DYK. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 23:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK - "the first one in the Great Patriotic war" could be?--Honzula 23:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry but no it couldn't. What is Great Patriotic War?--Pethr 23:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Try to put this term to the search box :-) --Honzula 23:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, try to put it into Wikipedia and you'll see that "the term is not generally used outside the former Soviet Union."--Pethr 23:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me, is this article about the soviet highest award or not?? --Honzula 23:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So, comrade, I checked your favorites Goranov and Gibelli (see this) Volkan Goranov was born in Bulgaria, in 20's he emigrated to USSR and joined Red Army, where he later served as the flying instructor, in 1936 was sent to Spanish civil war, in December 31, 1936 awarded Hero of USSR, later he became the Gold Star of HoSU No 22, training pilots in WW2, return to Bulgaria not until end WW2. Primo Gibelli was born in Italy, in 1921 he emigrated to USSR and joined Red Army (first as the infantryman, since 1923 as the pilot), in 1936 was sent to Spanish civil war, in November 14, 1936 was shot down and killed by fascist, awarded in memoriam. In the same website, Otakar Jaroš is considered to be "the first of foreign soldiers honoured by title Hero of the Soviet Union" and also "the first foreigner honoured by the highest award of USSR".--Honzula 18:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know military language but I edited Otakar Jaros because I nominated it for WP:DYK, I hope it will be chosen. Happy editing. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 16:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never told that nobody is allowed to edit this article and -of course- everybody can make the mistake, but:
1) It's my strong opinion that the way "copy and paste" resp. "copy and translate" is not a good way to create the wiki article.
2) To make a mistake is human, to make 5 mistakes in one section needs a special talent...

Be well!--Honzula 16:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read once more WP:Civility. I can't count mistakes you've done in the article and nobody is preaching you about them. Be at least as kind to others as they are to you. Thank you.--Pethr 20:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Itzhak Stern

[edit]

I have no problem with that, I only thought it was a vandalism. Feel free to unedit that. Also you would be interested in this [2], please check it and vote to avoid renaming Karlovy Vary to its german equivalent. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 14:38, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no need to be "very annoyed". I was relying on this source: Herbert Steinhouse, "The Real Oskar Schindler", Saturday Night Magazine, (April, 1994) for the edits I made, as listed in the References.

I might add that you should refrain from using such terms as "such stupidity", this is not the WP:civil tone expected of editors, you know.

Thanks for your corrections JGHowes 12:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The term "such stupidity" was not on you, but the author of that nonsense. I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. I just thought that nobody who was ever interested in the V2 history (saw some TV documentary or have read any book) can have idea that Brněnec was a place for making rockets components.--Honzula 08:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for understanding. And patience... ;-) --Honzula 18:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you uploaded the above image and have in the description, "This is a photocopy from a book a could be deleted." I'm taking this to mean you with the photo to be deleted. If this is the case, please consider adding {{db-self}} to the image and an admin will delete it. Thank you.↔NMajdantalk 13:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to show this docs to one user (have no other contact to him). After this the picture could be deleted and I'm ready to do it.--Honzula 13:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think, the image can be deleted now. If you know any admin, you can tell him/her. Thanks for the maintenance of the picture to present.--Honzula 07:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "this"?

[edit]

Richard has quoted two Wintersonne texts about Sudetengermans, so I have given an example of Wintersonne revisonism. Your comment may be undersood the way, that you accuse me that I'm revisionistic. I'm not.Xx236 11:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My comment was on Richard, but could be understand also in general - in used "man can" be arested, not "you can". Don't worry, I see what you mean when you have shown us this link.--Honzula 20:30, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brno You might be interested [3]. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 22:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brunn

[edit]

Na to pozor, jakmile dojdeme ke konsensu, ze Brunn je znamy v anglictine, tak jsme v haji, protoze podle policy, ze se ma pouzivat AJ to vsude budou moci prejmenovat. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 09:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ale pokud Anglicani tvrdi, ze u nich pod timto nazvem Brno zname je, tezko s tim neco nadelame. Mi osobne by vyhovovala soucasna uprava - ostatni jaz. verze v etymologii, ale paklize vetsina starsi angl. literatury hovori o Brunn... - Meli bychom se soustredit na to, zda se u nich pise "Brunn" nebo "Brünn". V tom prvnim pripade pak nepripada v uvahu, aby se do uvodniho odstavce dostalo "lang-de", ale budu trvat na "lang-en". --Honzula 09:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oskar Schindler

[edit]

Hello, thanks for cleaning up the recent edits to this article which apparently "were already disputed". For what it's worth, I did check the talk page and didn't see any of my changes under dispute, so perhaps something has been deleted from there which should be returned. Anyway, I'm writing to ask you if we can try to improve the wording in one sentence. I changed "The number of survived Jews is uncertain" to "The number of Jews saved is uncertain" because the former is a rather obscure use of "survived" in that tense. I think it's unclear what it means, precisely, because the unusual phrasing leaves the reader wondering if they've missed a subtlety. I appreciate that "saved" has certain nuances which may be undesirable, but I had considered using "surviving" only to decide that this too was wrong, since it implies still surviving. We really need to clean up "survived" though, so that we're being clear. Can you think of any other compromise ways of putting this which would satisfy? – Kieran T (talk) 10:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The main change was the disputed scatological term, the second change, I see now, I didn't make, but I've changed the word "saved" instead. To dispute the terms "saved" and "survived" is not only about Schindler's part in this. For example, is not clear, how many prisoners died in Brněnec till liberation, some sources claimed 40 up to 62 (including 30-35 prisoners from the transport from Goleszow). The unknown number of people died after the liberation. At least 2 prisoners (the helpers of SS guard) were killed (lynched) immediately after the SS left the camp. etc. The word "survived" have regard on fact, that the lives of prisoners were in danger permanently. But I can agree with "saved" too. --Honzula 11:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for that extra info. How about if I just change the phrase to, "The number of Jews that survived is uncertain" ? – Kieran T (talk) 11:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I see no difference between "The number of Jews that survived is uncertain" and "The number of survived Jews is uncertain" so if you feel one variant is proper, you can change it. Honzula 13:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might be intereseted in this Survey. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 15:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hostýn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spring (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of massacres in the Czech Republic may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |complete toll 28 (including subsequent executions; part of [[German occupation of Czechoslovakia|German occupation]]
  • |complete toll 23 (including subsequent executions; part of [[German occupation of Czechoslovakia|German occupation]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:07, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of massacres in the Czech Republic may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |complete toll cca 600 (including those killed or died on the way from [[Johanngeorgenstadt]] to Lovosice; part of the [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:27, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Czechoslovak border fortifications during the Cold War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blockhaus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1st Panzer Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Industrial area. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beneš, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benedict. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of massacres in the Czech Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kyjov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:10, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uprising in Plzeň (1953), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strike. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sloboda (surname)
added a link pointing to Free men
Svoboda (surname)
added a link pointing to Free men
Swoboda (surname)
added a link pointing to Free men

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Honzula. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My bad - I've changed the tag to refimprove. On its own though IMDB, while a great source of info about movies and actors, does not hold great weight as a reference because literally anyone who registers with IMDB can create their own article.
Thanks for pointing out my error. MarkDask 13:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The same you can say about Wikipedia :-) But at the time, there is not so much about the plot, critic reception etc. in this article, so nothing to refer. --Honzula (talk) 10:46, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anton Diffring (Operation Daybreak, 1975) Heydrich and Frank.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anton Diffring (Operation Daybreak, 1975) Heydrich and Frank.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anton Diffring (Operation Daybreak, 1975) wounded Heydrich.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anton Diffring (Operation Daybreak, 1975) wounded Heydrich.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Detlef Bothe (Lidice, 2011) in the car.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Detlef Bothe (Lidice, 2011) in the car.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hannjo Hasse (Sokolovo, 1974) in the office.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hannjo Hasse (Sokolovo, 1974) in the office.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hannjo Hasse (Sokolovo, 1974) wounded Heydrich.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hannjo Hasse (Sokolovo, 1974) wounded Heydrich.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:John Carradine (Hitler's Madman, 1943) harassing.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:John Carradine (Hitler's Madman, 1943) harassing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Siegfried Loyda (Atentat, 1964) crown.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Siegfried Loyda (Atentat, 1964) crown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anton Diffring (Operation Daybreak, 1975) wounded Heydrich.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anton Diffring (Operation Daybreak, 1975) wounded Heydrich.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:John Carradine (Hitler's Madman, 1943) harassing.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:John Carradine (Hitler's Madman, 1943) harassing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Honzula. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding our edits at Zdeněk Mahler, remember that Wikipedia policies and guildlines require reliable sources, not simply sources. I removed IMDb because the use of user-generated sources is not advised. There is a specific page in the Wikipedia namespace that stresses the use of sources better than IMDb (see Wikipedia:Citing IMDb) I don't read Czech, but the Czech film database also seems to be an unreliable source for the same reason. I linked to WP:UGC and WP:Citing IMDb in this edit and suggest reading them. As for where I saw the material leading to my edit, see this. Vycl1994 (talk) 06:11, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vycl1994, I don't have big problem that you removed link to IMDb (or FDB), though there are articles on en-wiki where most of the cited sources is from IMDb. But the main problem is, that you also removed the titles of more famous films to which Mahler contributed (despite this films are also mentioned in other, non-imdb sources cited in article) and you replaced them by another movie title without any source.--Honzula (talk) 12:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding other article's use of IMDb as a source, see other stuff exists. Non-English sources, if reliable, are permitted and I would suggest using them, but defer to your judgement here, as I am not fluent in Czech. Vycl1994 (talk) 13:34, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is not about being fluent in foreign language, in this case you can simply compare the movie/book titles if they are present in cited source. Which is quite easy as both English and Czech use the same Latin alphabet. I use to search the keywords even in cyrilic, greek or hebrew texts, despite I'm not fluent in any of these languages and my keyboard doesn't support writing them. Just to get the idea if the source is really related to the text of article, instead of simply deletion. --Honzula (talk) 08:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Detlef Bothe (Lidice, 2011) in the car.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This file is claimed to be used under Wikipedia's policy for non-free content but has no explanation as to why it is permitted under the policy. Non-free images need a rationale each time they are used in an article. A rationale must be included on this image description page. Unless at least one rationale is provided, the file will be deleted after Sunday, 1 April 2018.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fut.Perf. 18:18, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Detlef Bothe (Lidice, 2011) in the car.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Detlef Bothe (Lidice, 2011) in the car.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:10, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Hannjo Hasse (Sokolovo, 1974) in the office.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hannjo Hasse (Sokolovo, 1974) in the office.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:27, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I returned the Non-free use rationale to the article and adjusted it in accordance with current articles where the picture is used. --Honzula (talk) 09:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Siegfried Loyda (Atentat, 1964) crown.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Siegfried Loyda (Atentat, 1964) crown.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:47, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I returned the Non-free use rationale to the article and adjusted it in accordance with current articles where the picture is used.--Honzula (talk) 09:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Birth and death places

[edit]

Yes, I know, ordinarily I wouldn't consider it vandalism, but in this case, it was since it was almost certainly done in bad faith. Graham87 05:09, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Siegfried Loyda (Atentat, 1964) crown.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Siegfried Loyda (Atentat, 1964) crown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hannjo Hasse (Sokolovo, 1974) in the office.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hannjo Hasse (Sokolovo, 1974) in the office.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Honzula. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]