User talk:Humaira28

This is Humaira28's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachele Focardi (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Newystats was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To demonstrate wikipedia notability, there would need to be multiple secondary independent sources about the subject of the article.

"xyzatwork",  "speakerideas" and "generalassemb" are not independent of the subject of the article and the last reference is a book by the subject of the article.

In addition the article reads too much like a CV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachele Focardi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Newystats (talk) 03:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Humaira28! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Newystats (talk) 03:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rachele Focardi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Rachele Focardi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VViking_TalkEdits 15:04, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachele Focardi (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachele Focardi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rachele Focardi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rachele Focardi. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to write again and won't repeat my previous mistakes. Humaira28 (talk) 18:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have already repeated them, the draft is promotional and has zero indication of any notability. Theroadislong (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Humaira28, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! AntiDionysius (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Humaira28/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Humaira28/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AntiDionysius (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 18:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rachele Focardi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Rachele Focardi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 19:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me. They say that only Aira28 account is blocked but unfortunately, Humaira28 account is also blocked. Humaira28 (talk) 16:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are not blocked, but your draft WAS deleted because it was "unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view". Theroadislong (talk) 16:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no. unfortunatily This account is also blocked. Please help me. I request you. I am really worried about this.

here I paste what it says:"The account ‪Aira28‬ has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Justlettersandnumbers‬ for the following reason(s):

Sock puppetry, apparently inadvertent due to inexperience; user has offered to use only the User:Humaira28 account" But why this account is blocked please unblock it.

Humaira28 (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not able edit or publish any article. Humaira28 (talk) 17:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know you are busy, and I respect your time but please help me. Humaira28 (talk) 17:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but you do not appear to be blocked? Your draft has however been deleted. Can you confirm Justlettersandnumbers? Theroadislong (talk) 17:18, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not able to talk to Justlettersandnumbers. Please help me I beg you. It appear block as I send you in message. Actually, my IP is blocked.Please unblock it. Only block Aira28 account. Please.

And here is complete copy paste of what appears when I try to edit or use sand box: "You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

This account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.

The account ‪Aira28‬ has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Justlettersandnumbers‬ for the following reason(s):

Sock puppetry, apparently inadvertent due to inexperience; user has offered to use only the User:Humaira28 account

This block will not expire.

Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.

For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked" Humaira28 (talk) 17:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The I suggest you do as the note says and email the administrator in question. Theroadislong (talk) 17:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, Humaira28, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Aira28 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:04, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It is not my fault. Please listen that I have wrote a complete new and more better article but when I try to submitt it just appears previous one. I donot know what to do. And sorry Aira28 (talk) 19:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And this won't happen again. About different accounts I donot know but thanks for telling me. Aira28 (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me. They say that only Aira28 account is blocked but unfortunately, Humaira28 account is also blocked. Humaira28 (talk) 16:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

here I paste what it says:"The account ‪Aira28‬ has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Justlettersandnumbers‬ for the following reason(s):

Sock puppetry, apparently inadvertent due to inexperience; user has offered to use only the User:Humaira28 account" But why this account is blocked please unblock it. Humaira28 (talk) 16:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Humaira28, can you confirm that you are now able to log in? Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou so much. Yes I am now able to log in. I won't repeat my mistakes again. Humaira28 (talk) 11:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Rachele Focardi, from its old location at User:Humaira28/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 01:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. You appear to be here only to promote Rachele Focardi. Please stop. You are very close to being blocked for repeated versions of articles about her. Please also be aware of WP:UPE. Star Mississippi 21:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachele Focardi (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Amazon and Linkedin.com are not reliable independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachele Focardi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:25, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rachele Focardi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rachele Focardi. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Humaira28, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Humaira28|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 15:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rachele Focardi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rachele Focardi. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachele Focardi (February 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Star Mississippi was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There's no indication that Focardi is notable, and repeated resubmissions if independent, reliable sourcing doesn't exist will not help.

Star Mississippi 21:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]