User talk:IFIKHARY RASHID

Welcome![edit]

Hi IFIKHARY RASHID! I noticed your contributions to West Wallabi Island and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! JarrahTree 10:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful[edit]

Hello, please be more careful about what images to add to articles. Most of your recent contributions had to be reverted, either because the image you added was redundant (the same or better images were already in the articles), or because the same image addition had already been done by somebody else and found inappropriate and been reverted. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:05, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Or because they are irrelevant and don't represent the topic of the article, like your edit at Cloaca (reverted). Mathglot (talk) 05:05, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to still be making poorly-considered image additions, such as Special:Diff/1035955731 without properly explaining your reasoning, and currently more than half of your edits to Wikipedia have been reverted. If this behavior continues, you will lose your editing privileges. Please slow down, put more thought into your image-additions, and explain your reasoning clearly in edit summaries. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:28, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing advice[edit]

Please use a plain English edit summary, which can be understood by everyone.
Please disclose what accounts and IPs you are using.

Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 19:46, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 17:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IFIKHARY RASHID (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had low experience in editing some articals include english articals, so for now on i have already realize my mistake, and i will make sure that i will be more carefull during editing and it wont happen again such a mistake. please unblock so that i can keep on editing some more articals

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.