User talk:Interarefraction

~Post below this here line for the sake of keeping the format together~

October 2013

Hello, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tom Fulp because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Tentinator 19:03, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Interarefraction! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please stop your disruptive editing: [1] and [2] appear to be anti-Semitic trolling, and your commentary at Talk:Atheism appears to be soapboxing. Acroterion (talk) 13:31, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't disruptive, it can be ignored or collapsed. How about you stop lying about shit? Interarefraction (talk) 13:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Justin.Parallax (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't broken rules, so no I won't be blocked from editing. Sorry dear.Interarefraction (talk) 14:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that is the case, you may wish to read up on Wikipedia:NOTFORUM before continuing your use of talk pages. On a personal note, I'd also suggest checking out Wikipedia:Civility when working with other editors as this may help you to avoid further disputes in the future. Hope this helps. Justin.Parallax (talk) 14:34, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for the obvious fact that you are here to disrupt and push your point of view, not to contribute to building an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:48, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And I am putting you on notice that if you do appeal this block, you better make a very compelling argument for being unblocked or you will also find your talk page access revoked in short order. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage access revoked: to put it mildly, the argument fell short of compelling. Acroterion (talk) 19:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]