User talk:Inwichita

Welcome!

Hello, Inwichita, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Perhaps you could provide more information on Christian Exodus - when was it founded, and how far along are its plans? One of my students had tried to put me in touch with Cory Burnell some years back to coordinate between CE and the Libertarian Party's Free State Project, but I don't think anything ever came of that. Cheers! bd2412 T 23:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ed DeVries.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ed DeVries.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Ed DeVries pic.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Ed DeVries pic.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Ed DeVries pic.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Ed DeVries pic.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 02:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cory Burnell

Dear Sir or Madam (Dr. DeVries?) -

I ran across the Christian Exodus when I was doing research on secessionist groups and did a little research on Cory Burnell, in the process discovering that he was a regional director of the League of the South. I have attempted to update his article with this information several times, but each time, it keeps getting removed - first by you, as a stated Christian Exodus board member, and subsequently by other individuals.

I understand your revert, so my issue is not really with you, because I cited an unreliable source and made a statement that, upon further investigation, cannot be proven. However, I have since found a more reliable source (Seattle Times) for the mere fact that he held office in the LoS, no mention of white supremacy at all. But every time I attempt to add just that little tidbit, it gets axed with no explanation. I am contacting you because you have a talk page and claim to be a person of possible influence in this matter, while the others are either anonymous or do not have talk pages, and nobody seems to be engaging in discussion on the article's talk page or explaining their reverts in their edit comments.

What I want to understand is this - if I can provide a reliable citation that Mr. Burnell was a regional director of the League of the South, why do people keep deleting it without comment? If this fact is wrong, why won't anyone explain this in their edit comments or on the talk page? I really want to believe the best of people, but this is starting to feel like a bit of a cover-up operation, which would clearly violate the WP:NPOV policy. If you do have any connection to the other editors of this article, can you please advise them that, despite their desire to distance themselves from any connection to the LoS, that facts are facts and are thus appropriate content for this article? Deleting something just because it casts a negative light on something they hold dear is not neutral, and thus not encyclopedic.

I really mean no disrespect and just want to work this issue through to resolution. I look forward to working with you to reach a friendly compromise. Steve Carlson^Talk 08:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Edward DeVries, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is particularly important when it comes to biographies of living people, where policy states that any material that is unsourced, whether it is positive, negative or neutral, should be immediately and without discussion removed. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original references to the article. Thank you. Moonriddengirl 12:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]