User talk:Ishanshah012

This is Ishanshah012's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine (September 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Noting the CPC-EM website is a primary source and therefore not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ishanshah012! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine (September 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tom (LT) were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:WEASEL. All the qualifications regarding the editorial panel should be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tom (LT) (talk) 23:37, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Hello Ishanshah012. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ishanshah012. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ishanshah012|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 1, 2020 - Response to Tom (LT) from September 30, 2020[edit]

Hello Tom (LT)!

Thank you for your feedback and for clarifying what I need to fix on my draft. I am being paid for the creation of this Wikipedia article page as disclosed here:

Ishanshah012, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Shahram Lotfipour on behalf of CPC-EM for their contributions to Wikipedia.

. This is my first time creating a Wikipedia page, so my apologies for not disclosing it before.

Are there other additional changes I need to make for the page to be accepted and made live? Thank you! Ishanshah012 (talk) 19:46, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please see feedback I provided on the article, and then AFTER you have addressed that (which is more than the one day last time) please resubmit it for a third opinion. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:45, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tom (LT)! Just as a clarification to your feedback, would I need to remove the affiliation/workplace or the title of each editorial board member? Thank you! Ishanshah012 (talk) 03:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ishanshah012. As a volunteer, I have limited time to respond to these queries. Please use your time as a paid editor to familiarise yourself with the relevant guidelines, I would start at the WP:MOS and will also post some links for you. Further questions should be directed towards the WP:TEAHOUSE. Thank you. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hi Ishanshah012! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Tom (LT) (talk) 07:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine (October 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Inadequate attempt has been made to address previous advice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question[edit]

Hello, Ishanshah012! I'm Snowycats. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Snowycats (talk) 03:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question[edit]

Hello, Ishanshah012! I'm Snowycats. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Snowycats (talk) 18:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question[edit]

Hello, Ishanshah012! I'm Snowycats. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Snowycats (talk) 05:26, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine (October 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 06:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine (April 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine[edit]

Hello, Ishanshah012. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine[edit]

Hello, Ishanshah012. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:11, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]