User talk:Itsapu

Welcome

Hello Itsapu and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to the page Airlift (film), do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! - Managerarc™^talk 16:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Airlift (film) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diffs: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:51, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Cyphoidbomb. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 13:09, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Itsapu. You have new messages at Cyphoidbomb's talk page.
Message added 16:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Housefull 3, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [2] Per WP:UGC we do not use user-generated sources like blogs as references. Anyone can start a blog and claim to be an expert in any subject. Please stick to mainstream news sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your request here, as I've already explained, we do not accept blogs as references. Please stop requesting changes based on information you get from blogs and other poor sources. Stick to major online newspapers. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It collected 187.36.Why you are not updating?

What are you talking about? --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 06:24, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 23:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect "fix"

In this edit, your attempt to fix vandalism resulted in incorrect information being added to the article. BollywoodHungama indicated a gross of ₹216.36 crore[3] not 216.29 as you asserted. The value was already correct in this version of the article. If you fix vandalism, please be sure to fix it properly by checking the reference, and please double-check your work. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources

Hi there, re: this you should probably familiarize yourself with WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Koimoi is not considered a reliable source by the Indian cinema task force at Wikipedia. You're welcome to discuss at WT:ICTF. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect information

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Dhoom 3. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]