User talk:Jackriter
Greetings...[edit]
Hello, Jackriter, and welcome to Wikipedia!
- To get started, click on the link that says "welcome".
- I (and the rest of us here, too) hope you like it here and decide to stay!
- Happy editing! Skomorokh 03:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- I (and the rest of us here, too) hope you like it here and decide to stay!
Anarchist organizations[edit]
Yo Jack, just a quick note about Category:anarchist organizations - it's not generally supposed to be used in articles, but rather to collect its national subcategories. So, Japanese Anarchist Federation for example is properly categorized in Category:anarchist organizations of Japan, while Anarchist Federation (Britain and Ireland) should be in Category:Anarchist organizations of the United Kingdom and Category:Anarchist organizations of Ireland. For more information on this, see WP:SUBCAT. Cheers, Skomorokh 14:26, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- This is also true for the Category:anarchists category. It is not generally applied to articles, but is used to organize more specific categories that are. Kaldari (talk) 16:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Ararchist communists[edit]
What's your source for claiming all these people to be anarchist communists? Just curious. Kaldari (talk) 15:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't know if this is the correct way to reply, so sorry if this doesn't get to you.
The vast majority of anarchists are communists, and if I could remember which ones I put as communist anarchists, I'm sure I could find specific sources. Anarcho-syndicalists are also anarchist communists, but use different tactics (union organization vs political organization used by most non-syndicalist anarchist communists). I added members of large anarcho-syndicalist organizations too that explicitly say they aim for "libertarian communism" (this is in the constitution of the International Workers Association, the anarcho-syndicalist international, for example).
- The two I noticed specifically were Moishe Tokar, which is probably a reasonable assumption, and Gennaro Rubino, which was a bit surprising. What was the reason you marked Rubino as a communist? Kaldari (talk) 02:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Rubino was involved in infiltrating (then siding with) anarchist-communist groups quite obviously because A) Non-communist anarchism had little influence in Europe, and B) The only anarchist organizations were communist. The anarchist press that attacked him was communist as well, and since his action was in many ways an attempt to prove himself to the anarchists who had been active in denouncing him, it can be assumed he was a communist. If I can dig up his trial information, I'm sure I can find things like Ravachol's summary of his beliefs to his prison guards and the courtroom (which were communist, including things like abolishing money).
- That may have been true of Eastern Europe (and perhaps England), but not so much in countries like France, Italy, and Spain, where individualist Anarchism was strongly rooted. Probably the most notable example of the separation being the conflicts between the anarchists and communists immediately following the Spanish Civil War. Unless you have something more specific to point to, I'm inclined to remove the category from Gennaro Rubino's article. Also, the statement that the anarchist press that attacked him was communist isn't completely true either. The only cited example in the article is an American anarchist publication that was definitely not communist. Kaldari (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Your edit inspired me to do some research myself. I looked through the articles about his trial and nothing in them showed a communist influence. Indeed, Rubino seemed to be more anti-authoritarian than class-conscious. I also looked through the Milillo article. Nothing in that article mentions communism and Milillo seems to be of the opinion that Rubino was individualist: (rough translation from Italian) "Was he an anarchist individualist? A character who convinces himself of the necessity of regicide as liberation from a tyranny that had already committed many abuses of power in its political activity and its colonial occupation of the Congo? This seems to be the most authentic version of the event, the one to which Rubino confessed in his inquiry. He claimed, in fact, to have acted alone, without orders, and to be a solitary anarchist." Kaldari (talk) 15:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- The prescence of "individualism" in Western Europe was much different from those who would refer to themselves as "individualist anarchists" in America or in modern times. If you can't find a source though, i will understand if you remove it.
- Your edit inspired me to do some research myself. I looked through the articles about his trial and nothing in them showed a communist influence. Indeed, Rubino seemed to be more anti-authoritarian than class-conscious. I also looked through the Milillo article. Nothing in that article mentions communism and Milillo seems to be of the opinion that Rubino was individualist: (rough translation from Italian) "Was he an anarchist individualist? A character who convinces himself of the necessity of regicide as liberation from a tyranny that had already committed many abuses of power in its political activity and its colonial occupation of the Congo? This seems to be the most authentic version of the event, the one to which Rubino confessed in his inquiry. He claimed, in fact, to have acted alone, without orders, and to be a solitary anarchist." Kaldari (talk) 15:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- That may have been true of Eastern Europe (and perhaps England), but not so much in countries like France, Italy, and Spain, where individualist Anarchism was strongly rooted. Probably the most notable example of the separation being the conflicts between the anarchists and communists immediately following the Spanish Civil War. Unless you have something more specific to point to, I'm inclined to remove the category from Gennaro Rubino's article. Also, the statement that the anarchist press that attacked him was communist isn't completely true either. The only cited example in the article is an American anarchist publication that was definitely not communist. Kaldari (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Rubino was involved in infiltrating (then siding with) anarchist-communist groups quite obviously because A) Non-communist anarchism had little influence in Europe, and B) The only anarchist organizations were communist. The anarchist press that attacked him was communist as well, and since his action was in many ways an attempt to prove himself to the anarchists who had been active in denouncing him, it can be assumed he was a communist. If I can dig up his trial information, I'm sure I can find things like Ravachol's summary of his beliefs to his prison guards and the courtroom (which were communist, including things like abolishing money).
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Albert Guigui-Theral, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://libcom.org/history/guigui-theral-albert-1903-19?quicktabs_1=0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- I tried getting in touch with David Brown of Recollection Books, but no luck. I guess the email address on the Anarchist Encyclopedia site doesn't work anymore. Kaldari (talk) 21:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Albert Guigui-Theral[edit]
A tag has been placed on Albert Guigui-Theral requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpaceFlight89 17:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Anarchist Communist Initiative[edit]
A tag has been placed on Anarchist Communist Initiative requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — 141.156.175.125 (talk) 03:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
August 2009[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Anarchist Communist Initiative. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 04:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- I messed up on how to cite sources, but that's the only problem with it. I don't see it as vanfalism or unconstructive, I was asked to put how the AKI was notable, so I put some actions they did that make them notable. An explanation on how to cite sources would be helpful.
- Hey there! Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Quick_summary, hope it helps. 2help (message me) 04:36, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 13[edit]
Hi. When you recently edited Hoxhaism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Communist Party of Albania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 13 July 2012 (UTC)