User talk:James Patrick Wright

Welcome!

Hello, James Patrick Wright, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Ottawa Fencing Club, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mifter (talk) 21:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ottawa Fencing Club

A tag has been placed on Ottawa Fencing Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mifter (talk) 21:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of James patrick wright

A tag has been placed on James patrick wright requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 21:31, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ottawa Fencing Club has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Andy (talk) 22:09, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Ottawa Fencing Club. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mifter (talk) 04:33, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Parviz Haghendish

A tag has been placed on Parviz Haghendish requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 23:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Manuel Guittet

A tag has been placed on Manuel Guittet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DFS454 (talk) 18:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parviz Haghendish

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Parviz Haghendish, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://ra.ottawafencing.ca/about/coaches.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pasting Copywrighted Material

Please stop pasting copywrighted material onto Wikipedia--DFS454 (talk) 18:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parviz Haghendish

Hi Patrick,

if Parviz Haghendish represented and coached his country at fencing then we should have an article about him in Wikipedia, but we need to have independent verification that he did so. A Google search for his name only finds the RA Centre and Ottawa Fencing Club sites, which don't count as independent. Do you have any other sources for this information such as newspaper articles? They don't necessarily have to be online if you can provide full details of the publication. They also don't have to be in English - maybe there are some Persian language sources? Or maybe there are sources in English that use a different spelling of his name - often there is more than one way to spell a name in English when it originates from somewhere that doesn't use the Latin alphabet. If you can't find any such sources then the article may be deleted as information that is unverifiable. If you can't find any sources yourself then it would at least be useful if you could provide the spelling of his name in the Persian alphabet, which would help others to look for sources.

You may wish to read up on relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines such as verifiability, notability and reliable sources. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Parviz Haghendish

A tag has been placed on Parviz Haghendish, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 22:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Parviz Haghendish

I have nominated Parviz Haghendish, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parviz Haghendish. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 22:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Parviz Haghendish

If you can find sources (internet or print, English or Persian) which meet Wikipedia's reliable sources guideline, you should add them to the article or in the deletion discussion to ensure that the article is not deleted. If the claims in the article are proven, then it will pass WP:BIO, and will most likely be kept. Thanks, --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 17:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]