User talk:Jammin75

Welcome!

Hello, Jammin75, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:47, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:47, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 00:49, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —Non-Dropframe _talk 00:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that she meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to her, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what she claims or interviewing her or her management.
You gave some references, but they were not in-line so we can't tell what fact each is supporting, and in any case most did not meet the criteria linked above. Put your references, if you can find some suitable ones, in the the text following the fact each supports using <ref>[url description]</ref>. Then {{reflist}} at the end will automatically generate a numbered list
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Just one examples of a claim presented as fact: Her soaring vocals were an exciting feature, that's an unsourced opinion not verifiable fact
If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. In particular, if you work directly or indirectly for her or an associated company, or otherwise are acting on her behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the person or an affiliated company you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jammin75. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jammin75|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Before I restore the text to a draft page, please

Respond to the COI query above
Make sure you can find independent third-party references, if you can't, she's not notable and you are wasting your time
Please attempt to follow our rules. I notice you were warned three times about removing tags. If there's a fourth occurrence of disruptive editing, I will block you
Ignore the other Lisa Maxwell article, it's rubbish and not a suitable model.

Let me know if you wish to proceed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jimfbleak, I wish to proceed editing article in draft form. I don't have a COI, I'm just a fan who wants to write about this particular Lisa Maxwell. Thanks for getting back to me and pointing out the reasons for deletion and I will follow Wiki rules and criteria to the best of my abilityJammin75 (talk)

Hi Jimfbleak, the draft for Lisa Maxwell (Singer, Songwriter) is about done. How do I get it checked so it can be possibly published on Wiki Jammin75 (talk) 00:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think SwisterTwister's comments on the draft are spot on. You have but your references in the text, which is good, but it's the references themselves that are deficient. Discogs is unlikely ever to be acceptable. Follow the link in my first reply for RS sources. She seems reasonably notable, so something in the national press, official charts or similar would be appropriate. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I should have been clearer. Billboard and official charts are fine, its discogs that's more problematic. I can understand your frustration, but the fact that the other Lisa Maxwell's article is poor doesn't actually help you. You are on your way to an acceptable article, just grit your teeth and stick with it. if there is something that might be challenged and you can't reference it, just leave it out until you can Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The other point is that discogs has sales links, not a good idea. If an track etc has a wikipedia article, you don't need discogs to confirm its existence Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wish (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying the applicable standards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wish and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 02:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Wish has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wish. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 02:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wish (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NotTheFakeJTP was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional references in the "Credits" section are needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wish and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jammin75, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wish (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

per WP:NALBUM

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wish and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 02:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter) (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources only verify individual factoids. Majority of article is completely unsourced. For instance, there is the claim that 'Maxwell toured extensively, nationally and internationally with Kate Ceberano and The Ministry of Fun including a tour of South East Asia, Europe and America performing with Australian bands including Yothu Yindi for The Wizards Of Oz tour at The Palace Theatre in Los Angeles.' but the source to verify this is only an album credit. This is unacceptable. The rest of the article uses the same technique. It should be possible for someone else, given the same sources to recreate the article. As such, It would appear that the author has an undisclosed close association with the subject. Please see WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 06:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter) (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still too much unsourced info.Where is the source that says she was born in Melbourne. Where is the source that says she relocated to Sydney? Where is the source for her middle name. If it can't be verified, don't include it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 12:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter) (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SweetCanadianMullet was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lisa Maxwell (singer, songwriter) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SweetCanadianMullet 05:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wish Lisa Maxwell cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wish Lisa Maxwell cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wish (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To show notability, you need in-depth references from independent, reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wish and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wish concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wish, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wish concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wish, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wish

Hello, Jammin75. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wish".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]