2008

Welcome!

Hello, Jan eissfeldt! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! kevMAC (talk) 07:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Dyukov

Dyukov - fringe historian whose last book only printed 700 copies. His huge list in article undue weight [1]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.131.109.131 (talk) 13:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi Jan eissfeldt, I noticed that you do a lot of vandal-fighting. Would you like me to grant your account rollback rights for you to use alongside your current vandalism-reversion tools? Acalamari 20:25, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi Acalamari, if it helps en.wp., it´s okay. primary i´m a reader on this part of wikipedia and sometimes i want to support this section. I am pleased to confirm my agreement, if you think it´s enough, best regards, --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 20:36, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted. :) Rollback is an anti-vandalism tool that you can use alongside your current revert tools, so yes, you having it will help the English Wikipedia. However, rollback, just like the other revert tools, should only be used to revert vandalism. Good luck. Acalamari 20:40, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you Acalamari, i will do my very best :-), best regards, --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 20:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. :) You're very welcome. Acalamari 20:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alone in the Dark (2008 video game)

I noticed that there were three reverts done to an edit on this article by an IP, one which was yours. I'm not sure that anyone read what the IP took out, but in my estimation, the removal was quite legitimate. The paragraph that was added a little while earlier was poorly written and perhaps not accurate, since it wasn't sourced. Just wanted to convey my observation. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi Wildhartlivie, yes i read and revert. i misvalue the content and so don´t revert again (00:56). then i chance the projectsection, best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 10:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Please be more careful with rollback. Your use on this article was totally inappropriate. See Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, in particular dealing with edits by the subject of the article. The net effect of your rollbacks were to readd unsourced and (ultimately) incorrect information, and to cause harm to the subject of the content (who was trying to remove it). Daniel (talk) 03:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes, my mistake, best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 10:38, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ghostbusters: The Video Game, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Woland (talk) 21:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

monobookmistake or what?, best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 21:47, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, wrong button. Sorry dude. --Woland (talk) 21:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

all right, best regards to SUNY :)--Jan eissfeldt (talk) 21:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA Thanks

Thank you for your support at my RFA- it closed as a success. I saw that you have studied my rollback with no problems - all I can say is thank heavens that you voted before this happened (insert sheepish grin here). I promise not to have any slip-ups, now I have buttons that can do serious damage! Seriously though, your support means a lot to me, and for that I thank you. StephenBuxton (talk) 22:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi StephenBuxton. well, look at user:Woland s mistake one message up. nobody is perfect but you are one of the best RFA-candidates at en.wiki last time. every wiki-section has different RFA-systems and i respect this traditions on every section. you was my admin-candidate on en.wiki ;-). i m sure you ll be an effective sysop, best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 23:51, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

monobook.js

Hallo Jan, wahrscheinlich durch Veränderungen an der MediaWiki Software erschienen die Twinkle-Rollbacklinks bei Benutzung meines monobooks nicht mehr. Da du inzwischen Rollback hast, kannst du 'twinklefluff.js' durch 'adminfluff.js' ersetzen, diese kombiniert Twinkle mit Rollback und ist geupdated ('adminfluff' heißt sie nur, da es Rollback nur für Admins gab als ich die Seite ursprünglich erstellt habe). Desweiteren sollte jetzt bei Vandalismus nach Level4-Warnung ein Fenster aufpoppen und fragen, ob du an WP:AIV melden willst. Falls der Vandalenedit kurz vor deinem Revert gemacht wurde, kannst du immer ja klicken, sonst nein (um Reports von Vandalen auszuschließen, welche die Letzte Warnung für einen später gemachten aber früher revertierten Edit erhalten haben; und um sicherzustellen, dass nur Reports von noch aktiven Vandalen erfolgen). Außerdem sind jetzt die redundanten Rollbacklinks in den Benutzerbeiträgen verschwunden. Alles Gute für die Prüfungen. --Oxymoron⁸³ 10:27, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

moin Oxymoron83, werde ich ersetzen sobald ich mit UCB die gültigkeit der richtlinien auch für dieses unternehmen ausgekaspert und mich wieder den RC zugewand habe :-). vielen dank für den hinweis, gruß --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 11:55, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. StephenBuxton (talk) 09:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

latent class analysis

Regarding the latent class analysis remake: I can try. — fnielsen (talk) 10:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re your email: I am not sure why you asked me, or why you did it by email, but in any case it's not my field and not a topic I want to learn about. Sorry. --Hans Adler (talk) 22:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no problem :), best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 00:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which recently passed with 126 in support, 22 in opposition and 6 neutral votes.

Thanks for your support in my RFA!!
• If you want to reply to this message please use my talk page as watch listing about 150 pages is a bit messy •
·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 22:15, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Treaken etc.

hi im new to this and have no clue how to message a person directly and i have filled out a ablirtaion request against Redvers and i dont know if i filled it out right —Preceding unsigned comment added by Treaken (talk • contribs) 20:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

im confused how do message a person directly and what is --and four? also how does the abliration process work this site isn't very user friendly 11/11/08 Treaken

hi Treaken. to contact a person directly, do it like to contact me. please notice the wikipedia-policies. articles like Windows xp better than windows vista are against fundamental principals of the wikipedia. read WP:NPOV please :). for "what is --and four?" read Wikipedia:Signatures, please. wikipedia is a very complex system and it s difficult to handle it, if you are a ner user, best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 20:29, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i dont see how it vilates that it is pure fact that the game doesnt work on vista so that makes xp better at it so its fact and it should go in as fact --Treaken~ 11/11/08 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Treaken (talk • contribs) 20:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

that s possible, but your edit was against Wikipedia:No original research and the theme was to small for an new article. see also Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_manual.2C_guidebook_or_textbook, best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 20:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well how would i state my research i state in article that in the vista help site it has no solution to this for that game how owuld i cite that and how long does an artcle have to be? and how do you add references? --Treaken 20:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Treaken (talk • contribs)

this section of the wikipedia has not really efficient policies for questions like "how long?" but a there is a Wikipedia:List of guidelines. i think it is not possible to write "vista isn t a good system to play xy" because one game is to small theme for an article and wikipedia is not a how-to-play-xy-on-microsoftsystems-guide. for the second question: Wikipedia:Citing sources, best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 20:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i didnt say it isnt a good sytem even though i hate it lol it is an article to state things xp is better at then vista. vista is better at things then xp but thats not my article and it wont play that also in my article i had that Ris & Fall has to be set as administaror on vista to work and also that the total war games while playing campagin and you fight the battle after elaving it it shuts down the program and the help site has no fix so it is fact that these games work better on xp then vista. So would that be long nough and also how would i cite the vista help center? thank you for all your help. am i doing signature right? --Treaken 20:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Treaken (talk • contribs)

well, i ve never played the game but i think it s possible to write in the article of the game that the vista help center said: " viste is not the optimal system to play xy". ref like Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Footnote_summary. that is one way to cite in an article. your signature isn t perfect, use four ~ signs please or read Wikipedia:Signatures. best regards and no problem, no wikipedian is perfect :) --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 21:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meine Edits im englischen Bayern Artikel waren sehr angebracht. Mach lieber was konstruktives statt sie ständig zu löschen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by User: 84.56.121.192 00:01, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

No problem, and thanks for this and this!! ^LeaveSleaves _talk 23:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I recently got a message from you saying that I "vandalized" the wikipedia page for Camp Rock. This is completely untrue because I have never even looked at that page. Hollysuzannelyons (talk) 20:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage vandalism

Thanks a ton for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! The last couple days are the first time I've done speedy tagging, and I'm already amazed by how worked up people get over it. Wow. Thanks again! Camanda (talk) 01:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no problem :), best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 01:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dedication 3??

Where are you getting your info that it comes out tomorrow and not today? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.94.124.120 (talk) 01:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1, please take a look in the articlehistory and Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Footnote_summary citite, if you have new informaticions, best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 01:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Falcon football club

don't worry, ill move it back to my user page —Preceding unsigned comment added by DunnyGunner (talk • contribs) 00:46, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

stub - User:DunnyGunner

do i have to put a stub on my user page? how do i do that???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DunnyGunner (talk • contribs) 00:49, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a stub is a small regular article. the best way is to work with Wikipedia:Writing better articles, best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 00:52, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Family Foundation School

You removed this post from the Family Foundation School wikipedia Page because it is "unconstructive" "...also Mr. Cheripko holds the illustrious title of the staff member charged with the care of the only student to have committed suicide while enrolled at the Family School, and the only known death to occur on the campus..." The problem, Jan, is that the edit was accurate and legitimate. A staffmember who was charged with the safety of a student and had one die under his watch should not be lauded on the wiki for the school without some reference to his misdeed. How is this unconstructive? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CoreEpic (talk • contribs) 18:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi CoreEpic, the problem with this edit was simple. the reader, user:Jan eissfeldt for example, doesn´t know mr. Cheripko and this person isn´t important for the article Family Foundation School in 100 years. that´s the point, best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 00:30, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then why is his name included at all on the article? The reason why the school uses his name so freely is to propagandize their cause, and to aggrandize their staff, the problem is that Jan Cheripko while he has written books is personally responsible for the death of one of the students in the school. If you will allow his name to be listed on there at all, it should have that disclaimer attached to it, you allow the list of his accomplishments to be posted on the page, it is your responsibility to also allow his failure to be posted as well. CoreEpic (talk) 17:50, 19 December 2008 (UTC) Emil[reply]

2009

Article request

Yes, that's the one. Many thanks for your assistance, it's just what I need. Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 21:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no problem, best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 06:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KLima & VM

Hallo jan, schwierig bei Dir eine nachricht zu hinterlassen. Eine dritte meínung bei dem Thema frage würde ich beim Portal Physik tun, die bei Astrophysik wie beim zugehörigen Lemma auch zuständig sind. Ähnlich wie in der großen Forschungswelt sind die Astrophysiker und die Klimatologen da teilweise über Kreuz, was Du auch am Edit von M-J sehen kannst. Gute Nacht! --Polentario (talk) 00:58, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

see --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 21:08, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baustoffwerk Sehn-Stiftung

Hallo Jan, wie ich erfahren habe, muss ich mich an dich wenden. Leider war ich während der Löschdiskussion nicht zugegen. Und habe dann fälschlicherweise einen Antrag auf Wiederherstellung gestellt, anstatt dich direkt zu kontakten (was gar nicht so einfach ist).

Ich würde den Artikel zur Sehn-Stiftung gerne wieder bei Wikipedia sehen, denn die Relevanz ist meines Erachtens durchaus gegeben. Es besteht nicht nur ein öffentliches Interesse, sondern eine darüber hinausgehende überregionale Wahrnehmnung im Saarland und in Rheinland Pfalz. Dementsprechend findet die Stiftung auch sein mediales Echo.

Zudem möchte ich da noch anmerken, dass in den Relevanzkriterien für Stiftungen durchaus noch der Punkt öffentliches Interesse ergänzt werden könnte. Was meinst du dazu? --93.213.61.54 (talk) 13:16, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

moin, verfahrensfrage: mea maxima culpa für die komplikationen. ich weiß, dass das verfahren benutzerunfreundlich gestaltet, ja sehr kompliziert und bürokratisch ist. meine gegenwärtige zeiteinteilung zu ungunsten der deutschsprachigen version komt da sicher erschwerend hinzu.

zur sachfrage: ich habe gemäß antrag die löschung vollzogen, dass ist korrekt. die zu diesem zeitpunkt vorliegende version (einsehbar leider nur für administratoren) wies keinerlei außenwahrnehmung auf. den aus formalen gründen ("Wiedergänger") gelöschten versionen (12:39, 28. Aug. 2009 & 16:09, 20. Aug. 2009) entnehme ich ein mehr dieser unter die allgemeine relevanzbegründbarkeit fallenden inhalte. ist es möglich die journalistische wahrnehmung ("überregionale Wahrnehmnung im Saarland und in Rheinland Pfalz") als nachhaltig nachzuweisen. überregional ist die räumliche abgrenzung, die du anführst im maßstab der wikipedia leider nciht aber nachhaltigkeit wäre ein valides argument. dass das stiftungsziel sich mit allgemeinem öffentlichen interesse im einklang befinden soll, ist möglich aber nicht von bedeutung im sinne der wikipedianischen verfahren.

formale frage: öffentliche wahrnehmung muss als kriterium nicht in die spezifischen RK der lokalen (deutschsprachigen) ausgabe der wikipedia aufgenommen werden, weil der punkt bereits im allgemienen teil enthalten ist, gruß --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 21:08, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moin! Wenn das also in Ordnung geht, würde ich gerne einen neuen Text bei Wikipedia posten. An einer vielleicht folgenden Löschdiskussion werde ich diesmal dann auch aktiv teilnehmen. --93.213.31.104 (talk) 10:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geht das denn in Ordnung, wenn ich jetzt nochmal einen vollkommen überarbeiteten Artikel online stelle? Könnte ihn dir auch zur Voransicht schicken. Habe nun auf reputable, externe Quellen geachtet. Auch ist der Artikel wesentlich kürzer und auf das Wichtigste reduziert... --93.213.46.107 (talk) 07:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

.moin, sorry für die verzögerung (again). wenn der artikel sich an der darstellung anderer stiftungen orientiert, auf reputablen belegen basiert und die nachhaltige rezeption im artikel belegt nachgewiesen ist, dann ist gegen einen unmittelbaren upload nichts einzuwenden. ich lege keinen wert darauf ein ohnehin komplexes verfahren durch persönliche durchsicht und kontrolle vorab weiter zu verzögern. bei dem bestreben den artikel zu verkürzen achte bitte darauf ihn nicht so weit runterzukürzen, dass dir die eingangskontrolle einen "kein artikel"-Schnelllöschantrag reinsetzt, gruß --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 15:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was hältst du von dem Artikel den ich auf TAXmans Anraten auf einer Unterseite meiner Benutzerseite gepostet habe: Artikel Sehn-Stiftung ??? Grüße --93.213.54.84 (talk) 11:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ich hege zweifel bezüglich der de:WP:RK, werde aber natürlich nicht verhindern, so du eine wiedereinstellung anstrebst, gruß --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 00:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Length of altitude in triangle

Hello. I see you have reverted a blanking at Length of altitude in triangle. This is just a friendly reminder that author blankings of pages with no other major contributors should be marked for speedy deletion under criterion G7, not restored. If this action was performed with Huggle, I understand you mistake. Huggle had previously notified when reverting an original author's edit to a Newpage, but it does not anymore. In the future, please keep this in mind. Thank you. Intelligentsium 02:07, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi Intelligentsium, sorry i`m late. yes, you are right in both ways. i was just out (01:57) and tested the new version. next time i will be more carefull. thanks a lot for your helpfull attention :), king regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 03:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2010

Thank you so much for your help! I really appreciate it. I have revised based on your suggestions. Hec7 (talk) 03:19, 30 October 2010 (UTC) I really appreciate your quick response. I have gone through and tried to remove some of the ambiguity in the "of the times" ect. Is there any places you are especially concerned with? I also agree Scarff is a little obscure. I originally thought about delving further into the historical conflict of Biblical inerrancy but decided that was redundant. He was left over from some of that research. I thought he summed up the sentiment well and helped explain some of the reasons why new confessions are introduced. I can paraphrase if you think its distracting. Thanks again![reply]

Hec7 (talk) 20:56, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the use of church was ambiguous. I went through and capitalized church when ever it referred to the larger theological body, lower case when it referred to specific churches (like conservative church), and replaced church with denomination when I felt like its was more PC)USA) specific. Hope that helps. Hec7 (talk) 18:17, 31 October 2010 (UTC) HI, I was hoping for some guidance. Someone has come and started making a few changes here and there with a more critical view of the confession. His/her additions aren't wrong but defiantly change the tone of some of my points. Would you be willing to look over it? It is possible I over corrected and wasn't critical enough. I'm not sure when its appropriate to undo someone else's edits. Thank you for your help Hec7 (talk) 16:11, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ambassadors program

Hi Jan! Thanks for fixing up a few of the Campus Ambassadors subpages. Since you're one of the group contacts for WikiProject Classroom coordination, I wanted to invite you to sign up as an interested campus ambassador if you have any interest in that, and I also wanted to invite you to apply to be an Online Ambassador. If you're not interested in mentoring students on en-wiki but want to be part of our discussions about how to give assistance for Wikipedia assignments, I could add you to our Ambassadors Google Group as an advisor. Cheers!--Sage Ross - Online Faciliator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 17:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cyber Shockwave Article

Ha! Thanks for judging my Cyber ShockWave article. Much appreciated! user:SoAuthentic

my pleasure Peter, great work :). all best --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 19:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Jan, thanks for the help on those photos. I got permission via email from the hotel manager to use them, but you're right in that I don't have a legitimate licensing agreement to publish them. If you wouldn't mind keeping an eye on my work as I continue with this Public Policy Initiative, I'd appreciate it. ~~User:Klhrdy

hi Klhrdy, thanks for your clarification. i will keep an eye on your impressive progress and if you need something: please feel free to request my assistance :), all best --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 01:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2011

steering committee

No, no objections from me if you'd like to run. --Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 16:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]