User talk:Jay Kana

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jay Kana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was hacked :(

Decline reason:

Just kidding lol. Jay Kana 14:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Jay Kana! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Netsnipe ^(Talk) 04:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

"What do I do now?"

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page IG Farben Building on Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting or removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, thanks, and we hope that you will like Wikipedia. -- Netsnipe ^(Talk) 04:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there :) I just wanted to leave you a note to say that I'm slightly concerned about a couple of recent edits you've made, to articles like Shit, and Flag of the United States. You might want to bear in mind that edits to Wikipedia do need to be neutral point of view, and verifiable, backed up with reliable sources, otherwise your edits are likely to be removed, as those were. I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia, but if you remember things like that when editing, it'll benefit others more, and your work will remain in the articles. Thanks! --Mnem e son 00:24, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Shit on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it now: you've been blocked

Stop it now with the ridiculous {{fact}} templates and other trolling edits or you'll be blocked. Bishonen | talk 01:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I'll say as I said to the other kind fellow, assume good faith. I, my brother, like you, am merely trying to contribute to the society in the best way I can. Jay Kana 04:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, quite, quite. You've been blocked from editing Wikipedia for 24 hours. This is my own contribution. Bishonen | talk 04:20, 15 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]

You see? I'm not the only one who can be reasonable. Again, thank you. =) Jay Kana 04:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep your head up man

Don't let this uppity bitch get you down man, you are one of the better contributors to this shit. Fecal Matters 01:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

Please do not add ridiculous nominations to the featured article candidates. You obviously did not read the FA criteria and had no real intention of anything beyond a joke. If anything, your nomination was vandalism. The Filmaker 02:48, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith. I truely feel the shit article is an icon, not only of Wikipedia but of America itself, and that featuring it would not only benefit mankind but usher in a new era of encyclopedianess-ness-ity-ish. I would also, from the bottom of my heart, like to thank you for your concern and all you have done for Wikipedia, not just as an encyclopedia, but as a brotherhood. May the Patriot act protect you, and Big Brother watch over you. Jay Kana 04:06, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, Wikipedia:Assume good faith, what else. Did I mention you'd get blocked if you kept up the trolling? Here it comes: you've been blocked. If you've no plans for contributing to the encyclopedia, all you have to do is keep doing what you're doing and you'll be blocked indefinitely in short order. Bishonen | talk 04:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How is this trolling, friend? Jay Kana 04:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Assume the assumption of good faith, friend. Bishonen | talk 04:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Ah, good call, my fellow guardian of the knowledge and wisdom of Wikipedia. I did not find that article until after I had posted my previous comments. Nevertheless, I felt it was relevent as I seem to be the victim of circumstance. In any event it is only 24 hours so I won't complain. Good night, and may the Force be with you. !Jay Kana 04:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]