User talk:Jcstanley

Welcome!

Hello, Jcstanley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ralph Watkins, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Stuartyeates (talk) 17:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ralph Watkins

The article Ralph Watkins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Borderline notable academic whose biography is going to require a complete rewrite in encyclopedic style and much better sourcing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 17:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yale Divinity School may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Douglas Oldenburg]], President Emeritus at [[[Columbia Theological Seminary]] and the former moderator of the 210th General Assembly of the [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jasper Keith

Please fix the article, based on the tags noted on the bottom of this article. Bearian (talk) 21:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ben Campbell Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asbury College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pamela Cooper-White, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union Theological Seminary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anna Carter Florence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westminster Presbyterian Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John William Harkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christ Episcopal Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Azumah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trinity College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John William Harkins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John William Harkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John William Harkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, but we have a problem

New editors are welcome at Wikipedia, but it can take a little while to figure this place out. I've been here about a year, and I'm still finding my legs. As someone who often starts articles on academics, I sympathize with your impulse. However, only some academics qualify see: WP:PROFESSOR. The series of articles you stated may all come down in one fell swoop. Reason is, in order to stay up a Professor has to pass the notability bars enumerated at WP:PROFESSOR. And to do that you need to find reliable secondary sources. These range from reviews of books they have written in respected academic journals to profiles of a man's life and career in a daily newspaper. You have links in the welcome to Wikipedia greeting above. Or, you can look atthe Wikipedia articles of a few notable professors to get an idea of how things work. It is hard work to write a proper, encyclopedic article, but, failing that, the articles will be deleted.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you overlooked the link, you are welcome to comment in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/John_William_Harkins. The discussion will probably be closed on the 25th. To keep the Harkins article we need to show he meets one of the criteria at WP:PROFESSOR, or meets our General Notability Guideline (received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject). You should probably review your other articles too. Alsee (talk) 11:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you continue to create these articles (most recently, Jeffery Tribble), without responding to the concerns that have been expressed about notability. You would be well advised to engage with editors such as E.M.Gregory, Alsee and myself, because otherwise it is likely that processes that might result in the articles' deletion them will be started. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cordless Larry, thanks for alerting me to the new article at Jeffery Tribble. At the bottom of the page I opened Conflict of interest proceedings and custom-templated a warning for failure to talk. Jcstanley, if you're reading this, you really do need to start talking with us. Alsee (talk) 22:46, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jcstanley, as an uninvolved editor who saw this issue come up at WP:COIN, I urge you to begin communicating on your talkpage. Non-communicative editors don't usually have good outcomes once a case starts at COIN. However when communication begins, we can sort out issues and help each other to improve Wikipedia. - Brianhe (talk) 22:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alsee I am more than willing to assist and communicate in regards to ideas you may have to prevent the deletion of the articles on which I have worked hard. I apologize for the delayed response. Jcstanley (talk) 18:51, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Jcstanley. If you have no objection, we can create a work page in your userspace? (Userspace means a new page with a name like User:Jcstanley/PageName.) Perhaps User:Jcstanley/my articles? Then there can be a section for each bio, and you can identify which bios meet specific criteria at wp:Notability_(academics)? Start with simple clear cases like #6 current and former presidents of the school. Don't try to address things like "significant impact in their scholarly discipline" yet, unless it's a single sentence with maybe a single link that makes it very obvious. Most can be left blank on the first pass. Let us

the easiest most obvious cases first, just to narrow down the list.

Pinging Cordless Larry. Alsee (talk) 23:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC) Pinging DGG too. Alsee (talk) 23:31, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. You should consider Paul_J._Johnson and Jasper_Keith immediately. They are slated for deletion on the 9th and 13th if not contested. You can freely take down the proposed deletion notice to stop that process, if you think they might satisfy Notability, or there is information that could be added to establish Notability. Alsee (talk) 00:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alsee I have created a work page User:Jcstanley/my articles with the articles that have been written and information that will hopefully be useful in understanding and justifying their creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcstanley (talk • contribs) 21:07, 8 December 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.

Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Continuing to create or edit articles relating to Columbia Theological Seminary and faculty, without participating in discussion with other editors, may be considered disruptive. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Alsee (talk) 22:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul J. Johnson

The article Paul J. Johnson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem to meet notability criteria per WP:NACADEMICS. Basically, a mid-level manager in the religion industry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John Nagle (talk) 01:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

guide

As a guide to notability for notability under WP:PROF, presidents of the school , or holders of endowed professorships probably meet the requirements--tho this is an independent college and not a major university, and if you had confined himself to them, there would be much less of a problem. (endowed Associate professorships, btw, have generally not been considered to intrinsically meet WP:PROF.) For the others, WP:PROF depends upon publications, and probably a good many of them will meet the requirement. (As a complicating factor, we have in the past differed about considering non-scholarly works for this purpose, and often not considered it met by people writing entirely minor pastoral books and the like). DGG ( talk ) 06:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jasper Keith

The article Jasper Keith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:PROF (no significant publications) and WP:GNG also.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anna Carter Florence

The article Anna Carter Florence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Does not meet WP:PROF -- minor publications only, and holding a named Associate professorship does not intrinsically meet the standard there

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 18:32, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leon Carroll

The article Leon Carroll has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG -- minor publications only

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 18:36, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ralph Watkins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph Watkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Watkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anna Carter Florence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna Carter Florence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Carter Florence until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ben Campbell Johnson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Campbell Johnson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Campbell Johnson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jasper Keith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jasper Keith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasper Keith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leon Carroll for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leon Carroll is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leon Carroll until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jcstanley Article For Deletion discussions typically run for a week. You are welcome to participate, just click on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Name links above. You can "vote", but you need to include a good reason for it. Pointing out Notability reasons that other people missed can be strong, or even better show new sources/information which establishes Notability. A bunch of people who don't give good rationales carry little weight, and one person properly citing policy or posting important new information can outweigh many weak or refuted/obsolete responses. Alsee (talk) 21:39, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Thanks for creating these CTS faculty articles and for being an extremely good sport as we try to think about which might meet WP's standard of notability. It's been wonderful getting to know these people through the bios you've written. Best, -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stanley P. Saunders

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stanley P. Saunders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. IagoQnsi (talk) 18:32, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Douglas (ethicist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of G. Thompson Brown for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article G. Thompson Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Thompson Brown until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Azumah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Azumah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Azumah until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Rodger Nishioka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rodger Nishioka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodger Nishioka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Sara Myers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sara Myers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Myers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martha L. Moore-Keish, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Emory College and Union Theological Seminary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: John Leighton Wilson

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as John Leighton Wilson, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.ctsnet.edu/files/emeriti/Clarke%20Erskine%20bio%202011.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:John Leighton Wilson and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, John Leighton Wilson, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:John Leighton Wilson. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:John Leighton Wilson with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:John Leighton Wilson saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Cordless Larry (talk) 07:20, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jcstanley. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jcstanley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pamela Cooper-White

The article Pamela Cooper-White has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 19:17, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Jcstanley! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]