A cup of coffee for you!
|I am impressed by your longstanding enthusiastic contributions to categorizing articles and sorting links while keeping a low profile otherwise. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2014 (UTC)|
A page or category should rarely be placed in both a category and a subcategory or parent category (supercategory) of that category (unless the child category is non-diffusing – see below). For example, the article "Paris" need only be placed in "Category:Cities in France", not in both "Category:Cities in France" and "Category:Populated places in France". Since the first category (cities) is in the second category (populated places), readers are already given the information that Paris is a populated place in France by it being a city in France.
Just as in that example, Category:Michigan portals is in Category:United States portals by state or territory, so a reader is given the information that Portal:Michigan is a "United States portal by state" just by the fact that it is a "Michigan portal". There is no need to double up, and if the other states are in both, they all should be removed as well. Imzadi 1979 → 22:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jdaloner. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 01:42, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for updating the documentation for those "contradict" templates. It's something I've been meaning to do for months but never got around to. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 06:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Totally hear your point here, my mistake. Was thinking that if the awrds/noms come under the Interscope label, then it would make sense to have them listed. Sorry again! Jppcap (talk) 22:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)