Hello, Jeanne dArc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
I have changed your article --Sister Faustina-- to a redirect to the article that already exists Faustyna Kowalska. Please feel free to edit the already existing article if you believe that there is anything missing from there. In the future you might want to do a "Google" search to check & see if there are already existing articles. SkierRMH10:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed your article --Jesus of Divine Mercy-- to a redirect to the article that already exists: Chaplet of Divine Mercy. Please feel free to edit the already existing article if you believe that there is anything missing from there. In the future you might want to do a "Google" search to check & see if there are already existing articles.
InfernoXV14:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please try to read articles fully before editing. (a) Menlo, Galway was already in the article. (b) Castlegar is not in the US of A. I've reverted your edit, but I've added "parish of Castlegar" to the Galway Menlo. --Red King23:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Knockeyon and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Knockeyon with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Knockeyon.
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Whpq21:37, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Foster & Allen 2007.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk)16:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Infrastructure comparisson.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Infrastructure comparisson.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Could you please leave reasons when attaching such tags to articles, so that the people editing it can make the changes necessary to get it back in line? Otherwise nothing will ever be done about it. Cheers Fossiliferous16:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jeanne d'Arc; you are a very efficient coordinator I see! We seem to be following one another around - so it was with Glenveagh. You put the lake plus photo into a lake infobox; but the article is about a park not the lake and the lake is called Lough Veagh not Lough Glenveagh.
To have a infobox for the lake would suggest a separate article?
We need to either remove the box and substitute with a "parkbox" (if such exists) or else leave the photo as a stand-alone without a box or move the box+photo to a new article Lough Veagh.
Sorry for sounding picky, but like yourself I am a Virgo and a perfectionist!! (Sarah77720:12, 6 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]
Hi Jeanne. I reverted the change you made earlier to Inisheer, and would like to confirm with you the rationale for adding a lighthouse template, that is not related to the high level topic.
Firstly, "Kilronan Lighthouse" (the label that was on the template) isn't on Inisheer. And while "Inisheer Lighthouse" is, it's not the subject of the article.
Secondly, I'm personally unsure about the notion of adding a template which deals with a subject that is not the article's key topic. (The Inisheer article doesn't even mention the lighthouse). While I can certainly understand adding a Lighthouse Template to an article ABOUT a lighthouse (like Dohaghadee Lighthouse), I'm not sure about adding a top level template (which deals with a lighthouse) to an article which doesn't discuss that lighthouse.
And finally, the template you are adding to these pages is for Mountains. And so it has details on "elevation" and "prominence". These are unsuitable when the subject is a lighthouse. You do know that there already is a lighthouse template right? At Template:Infobox_Lighthouse?
I'd strongly recommend changing all your recent additions to use this infobox instead... (As noted, the one you are using is not entirely appropriate)
Thanks for uploading Image:Infrastructure comparisson.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot23:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:D Cassidy.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:D Cassidy.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
So then, somone using this user name copied my image of Athlone over into WC; it is now attributed to Jeanne dArc and displayed under a different usage agreement; I thought you should knowDmccabe (talk) 04:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article European route E02, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Joe Dolan b.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:Westmeath coo coat of arms.PNG listed for deletion
Your upload of File:Canal Mullingar 01.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out)14:56, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Infrastructure comparisson.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
){kind=link}
