User talk:Jeremybass26

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jeremybass26, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Proof of existence of Heaven and Hell, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are struck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Passenger pigeon (talk) 11:21, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Proof of existence of Heaven and Hell[edit]

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Proof of existence of Heaven and Hell. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Passenger pigeon (talk) 11:21, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a hoax.[edit]

I am Jeremy Bass and I did just as stated. I am providing the proof of the Microsoft section shortly. Ask me any question you wish, I have the definition for what definitively set good from evil. It's all proven with science and not really religious to be exacting. 11:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Please do not use Wikipedia to propagate blatant hoaxes and misinformation. Java Hurricane 11:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is the "blatant hoaxes and misinformation" ? JeremyBass26 11:34, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your claim to have proved the existence of heaven and hell and have taken over Microsoft. Both claims are clearly false. Java Hurricane 11:40, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it clearly false? I have the emails. I have been talking with them. And I came up with the proof. Read it slower if needed but break it I dare you to leave it to be proven hoax. It's ridiculous that you dare to say I didn't have the email chain. Here is a sample bit since as the instructions said there was no deadline. I was not even done. Your trying to suppress new information just because you don't understand it. JeremyBass26 Jeremybass26 (talk) 11:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am simply keeping the encyclopedia clean of blatant vandalism and misinformation. Java Hurricane 11:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"clean of blatant vandalism and misinformation" I am sorry, please present your credentials to dispute me. I am trying to get the email proof but it's not playing well. You are not liking what I am saying it seems but that doesn't make it misinformation. Here is a link so a little sample of proof to come (redacted personal info) JeremyBass26 Jeremybass26 (talk) 11:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1. Don't post personal information. I have removed it per Wikipedia's guidelines on personally identifiable information.

2. That is no "proof" - it's obvious you are trolling us. I'm not going to respond to any of your messages anymore as it is proving to be a waste of my time. Java Hurricane 11:55, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trolling you.. Look man, you are trying to suppress information because you don't understand. I give you a gift. You will want to read it closely as I fear with your attitude you are bound for a hell of an after life. Look what proof do you want then? Stop being so Trump-ish Jeremybass26 (talk) Jeremybass26 (talk) 11:59, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 12:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeremybass26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not even allowed to finish the page and provide the relative proof. You all have jumped on it so fast and plain ignore the fact that your instructions clearly said there was no deadline. It was still draft. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it a hoax. Sorry you don't like the outcome of your self determination. Read it again. You guys just killed the information because you don't like it, and not because there was no evidence. I didn't even have time to prep it since this was still a draft. Its said 60days, not 20 mins. Jeremybass26 (talk) 12:10, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Having reviewed the page in question, I am confident that blocking you was the right call. PhilKnight (talk) 12:21, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.