User talk:Jgdh71

Hello, Jgdh71, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Getting started

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

Finding your way around

• Table of contents
• Directories and indexes
• Department directory

Editing articles

• How to develop an article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help

• Frequently asked questions
• Cheatsheet
• Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
• The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
• Help pages
• Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

• Community Portal
• Join a WikiProject
• Follow Wikipedia etiquette
• Practice civility
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caught In A Fantasy (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caught In A Fantasy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Jgdh71! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Hi Jgdh71! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.

Do not attempt to promote your own website on Wikipedia. It is not a Reliable source and self promotion of any kind is not permitted on Wikipedia. Cullen328 (talk) 18:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Damsel (2024 film), you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Mike Allen 18:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Your elitist self-appointed importance is exactly is what is wrong with Wikipedia. I saw the disparaging chat "ooh, a wix site, how awful". Well, that awful site has five thousand readers, more than the apparently so revered reviewers that you and others think are so valuable. Quite why you think you have the deciding point of view is baffling. Jgdh71 (talk) 18:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Dude stop spamming your WIX website on Wikipedia. This may be of interest. Mike Allen 20:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

‘Five thousand readers’ is not enough – plus, your so called ‘specialist review site’ doesn’t even have the secondary source proper coverage enough for it to ‘make sense.’ Also, an admin went forward with a similar warning to you before he did, and if you go against Mike now who warned you again, you’re also going against him (and by extension, me.)

Your (rather unprofessional, due to the [wixsite] domain) website’s audience alone does not define credibility.

Maybe think about that instead of bickering.

Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 22:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

You're amazing. Everyone is in awe. Jgdh71 (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You were warned that self-promotion of any kind is not permitted on Wikipedia. Not only did you violate the warning but you continued to self-promote with an unpersuasive argument. Your website is not a reliable source for use on Wikipedia. Cullen328 (talk) 03:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)