User talk:JohnPRoco
Welcome!
[edit]
|
December 2011
[edit]Hello! I'm a bot created by another Wikipedia editor. I wanted to let you know that I removed a link that you recently added to the page United States Senate election in Hawaii, 2012 here. I did this because http://www.youtube.com/johnproco/ is probably inappropriate for an encyclopedia. We generally try to avoid linking to external audio or video.
We appreciate your help in making Wikipedia better for everyone. If I made a mistake, feel free to undo my edit. If you have any questions, you can ask at the Help desk.
Thank you! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in United States Senate election in Hawaii, 2012. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.. Please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:03, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to United States Senate election in Hawaii, 2012. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 18:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Our Campaigns
[edit]Our Campaigns is not a reputable source that can proved a valid proof of someone running for office. And, I am in complete agreement with what the other editors have said above, Wikipedia is not for self-promotion. America69 (talk) 18:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Just to add that I agree with America69, that website isn't a reputable source. If you can find another one, please feel free to add it. Tiller54 (talk) 15:32, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- I feel that OurCampaigns is a useful source of statistical material, particularly on historical races. However, they are not a suitable venue for trying to claim that Roco is a recognized candidate. We need solid evidence from the press. In the meantime, Roco needs a warning here, given his pattern of edits. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:09, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at United States Senate election in Hawaii, 2012, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:09, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.America69 (talk) 18:48, 27 December 2011 (UTC)