User talk:Johnvertasilo999

Welcome!

Hello, Johnvertasilo999, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Johnvertasilo999, good luck, and have fun. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 15:44, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Larze (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Larze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 06:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnvertasilo999! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 06:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Draft:Daniel Larze, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 06:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As the template says, you should not remove it. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 06:49, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Daniel Larze, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 06:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Draft:Daniel Larze, you may be blocked from editing. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 06:51, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you were previously warned for this as Reubenbot, if you remove the AfC template one more time, you will be reported, and a block requested, to give you time to read up on the policies and guidelines Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 06:55, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because you are exhausting everyone else's patience here with your persist removal of those templates, which you have now removed a total of ten times, for reference: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

So, yeah, I'm serious, you will be getting a block if you dont stop removing those templates. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 07:04, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did with this edit to Draft:Daniel Larze. Adakiko (talk) 07:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, theyre getting blocked anyway. I've lost patience with this user. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 07:25, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Larze (August 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Persistent removal of AfC templates despite innumerable warnings. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 07:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong: Turns out this editor is a sock of Daniel Larze (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I've G5'd the page and requested salting. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 07:49, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]