User talk:Kameejl/Archive 3

Photo Argument

Do not report it for being "unfree" when it's not...obviously nobody agrees with you because it hasn't been deleted. Tribestros (talk) 20:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, wikifriend

I'm sorry to hear about your block...I only discovered later that it had even happened. Hopefully, you have sorted the matter out. I see the recent attention you have gotten for some code you have been writing. Just wanted to say hi and ask if you were in need of any help with anything. I've just been working on a bunch of different articles. I've been AfD'ing a bunch of bands that are non-notable and reporting a bunch of vandals, etc. Well, good luck with the editing! Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 22:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with you. Good job on being bold!!! Let me know what happens with your code and everything! Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 17:15, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm alright. You? That's great that you've finished it! You should be careful, though. If you go with line breaks you know you're gonna start a war, right? People are gonna be pissed. You know there are a lot of proponents on both sides. If it was up to me, though (theoretically, of course) I think I would go with what you are saying (I'd actually have to see your infobox, though, to know exactly what you were talking about) but I would definitely go with line breaks (hey, let's face it, I admit I prefer them for a number of reasons). Line breaks have been around a lot longer and work just fine for me. They seem to be more functional than comma breaks and there is no worry of words being cut. Line breaks are more simplistic and look more encyclopedic to me and make things much easier to read. Are you going to start using your script, though? As I said, it's gonna cause a war and piss off a lot of people if you do. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 23:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Those infoboxes look good! I don't quite understand, though. Will people still be able to put comma breaks between genres and other sections? Because there are people who are going to want to and won't accept line breaks. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 19:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I think I see now. It's a skin right? It will only change everything to line breaks and what not for the users who decide to use the skin? If that's the case, that's great!!!! I love it already. I might try it (if you tell me how), but I'm not sure if I will use it. I only say that is because I would feel that a skin might be hindering how the page actually did look and that while I was looking at the rosy nice version others might be saying mistakes and stuff that we might look over. However, I would definitely encourage anyone to use such a skin!!! That's quite something! Good job! Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 21:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your javascript

I owe you an apology. Looking over the script, i did notice that it changes commas to line breaks. I did however not know WHERE it does that. Given our conflicts in the past, i made the mistake of assuming bad faith. I shall not do so again, and hope you don't take it personal. (I am assuming that changing how the page is displayed is and will remain the only function of the javascript. I do assume right, don't i?). ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 10:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Metalcore#Attention_to_all:_New_Wave_of_American_Heavy_Metal

What's your opinion? Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 22:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

I wanted to ask you a question, since you're a fan of heavy metal. Me and another user have been having some problems on the Shadows Fall page. I'm not a fan of their music but I noticed that someone had put thrash metal as one of their genres and I immediately changed it to metalcore, as I believe that is the style of music they play. Now the other editor didn't agree with this and we had a little edit war. Well now I want to gather some consensus on it so we can resolve the issue. If you go here you may vote on what genre(s) you think Shadows Fall has played. Thanks. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 19:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you need any help with anything feel free to let me know. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 19:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dying Fetus

In the lyric booklet for Killing on Adrenaline, it states that "no pitchshifters or other vocal effects were used in the making of this album." I'm just interested to know if they've continued producing such gutteral, low vocals without the aid of a machine.

Also, do you know if they've selected the replacement for Mike Kimball yet? Festering Rat Corpse (talk) 18:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genre delimiter problems. Uh oh!

Hey, what's up? We got problems! During my absence I see that line breaks have seemingly become more popular for metal bands (at least). That's fine but look at the Template:Infobox Musical artist. Someone recently changed it while I was gone. It now has both infoboxes with comma breaks! That doesn't even make sense, to have two infoboxes that are the same. One is supposed to have comma breaks and the other line breaks. This means trouble. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 16:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work to keep wikipedia correct, fair and just! You deserve some sort of barnstar for this in the near future. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 16:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi. I just wanted to ask what is incomprehensible about this sentence from Meshuggah article? Can you please look up at the source, rewrite the sentence and make it comprehensible? Thanks-- LYKANTROP 07:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NWOAHM

I was wondering what you thought of something. The New Wave of American Heavy Metal. Do you believe it exists or not? I personally, do not. I think it's the same thing as metalcore which is where it used to redirect. User:Lykantrop sees otherwise and created the article which I am now contemplating deleting. I have made many of my arguements here on the "NWOAHM" talk page and made even more on the talk page of metalcore in the section about this "NWOAHM." I think it does not exist for many reasons and per WP:NEO and pure logic it should be deleted. Tell me what you think. If you need to here some of my arguments for why it doesn't exist feel free to ask and I'll deliver a pile of 'em. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 16:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For impeccable scrutiny, surgeon-like precision and services to the community at large. For always being there and being ready to do the right thing, that benefits the most people and is the fairest judgement, at a moment's notice. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 17:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For being of service to Wikipedia in times of need. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 17:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Peace
		For keeping the peace and staying fair and just. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 17:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Metalcore

Hallo. Answer please my question on Talk:Metalcore#NWOAHM in this article. Thanks-- LYKANTROP 22:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Death Metal (Possessed demo)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Death Metal (Possessed demo), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding (talk) 09:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Death Metal (Possessed demo)

I have nominated Death Metal (Possessed demo), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Metal (Possessed demo). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? B. Wolterding (talk) 18:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Death 'n' Roll

You should visit the Death 'n' roll talk page. I've made some comments on your "Concerns" topic that might be of your interest. Musicaindustrial (talk) 18:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Answered your comments again... Musicaindustrial (talk) 22:08, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

obZen

You might want to read the bottom of the talk page of that article. I typed something there that you might want to know about. BT^C 22:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Grindcore

Kameejl, although I actually agree with some of your edits (the avant-garde jazz thing you mentioned), some of the other stuff you argued is absurd. Carcass a minor grindcore band? That's like saying Megadeth is a "minor thrash band" because they're second to Metallica. But I'll explain myself better on the Grindcore discussion page. Anyway, thanks for the heads-up. Musicaindustrial (talk) 13:03, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Possessed - Seven Churches - 10 - Death Metal (partial).ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Possessed - Seven Churches - 10 - Death Metal (partial).ogg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 23:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Death Metal (Possessed demo)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Death Metal (Possessed demo), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 17:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Death Metal (Possessed demo)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Death Metal (Possessed demo), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Metal (Possessed demo) (2nd nomination). Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 21:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kamchatka-Kamchatka.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Kamchatka-Kamchatka.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brutal death metal

Please come back! Brutal death metal has been put up for deletion! A misunderstanding nomination of course by Blackmetalbaz and an unnecessary delete at best. I guess he wants technical death metal, melodic death metal and other "x" death metal genres deleted too. Please save it!!! 137.124.9.20 (talk) 01:56, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Suffocation - effigy of the forgotten.ogg)

Thanks for uploading File:Suffocation - effigy of the forgotten.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:29, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Starkweather (band)

I have nominated Starkweather (band), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starkweather (band). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. لenna vecia 12:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cypher darkday carnival.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Cypher darkday carnival.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Metallica - St. Anger.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Metallica - St. Anger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal

Hello Kameejl/Archive 3, you have received this notice because you have placed your name on the list of members of WikiProject Metal. We are currently looking to make the wikiproject more active, and in doing so, we need to have a list of active members on the wikiproject. If you wish to stay an active part of wikiproject metal, please add your username to Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Active Users. Conversely, if you wish to leave the wikiproject, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Members. Thank you.

Orphaned non-free image File:Descendents-Enjoy!.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Descendents-Enjoy!.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:34, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]