User talk:Karurarav

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Karurarav! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rosiestep and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rosiestep (talk) 18:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taye Balogun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taye Balogun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taye Balogun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 15:57, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Tower (2018 film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Tower (2018 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.jour2fete.com/system/files/lineup/efm-2018/jour2fete-lineup-efm-2018-1393.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 09:33, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello Karurarav. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Karurarav. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Karurarav|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:17, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Praxidicae, Thanks for your message. I am not getting paid from anyone for the edits, Infact after reading your message only I came to know that this kind of actives are there in Wikipedia. I understand your points and here after to get clarity in my edit I will submit the article through articles for creation process. Thank you Karurarav (talk) 17:09, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, please explain how this, this and this are your own work. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am a traveler and photographer. I have more such photograph of many peoples in all kinds of region. Karurarav (talk) 17:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So, you just randomly met this person you don't know and have no connection with, in the middle of a field and took her photo? PRAXIDICAE💕 17:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have penpals and we have a cloud share admire each other works. My mistake was that I should not used it as own work, I admit it, as should have given credit to my penpals name. Karurarav (talk) 17:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So you just happen to be friends with someone closely to connected to her but have no connection and are just a fan? PRAXIDICAE💕 17:29, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I really do not know about such things, I will ask my penpal and let you know. I also want to tell you one think that I did not get any penny for my Wikipedia article. I used to share my works in our cloud group and view others work too, suddenly I saw the recent photo and I liked the photo and came to know about the person in the photo then developed the page as my personal interest Karurarav (talk) 17:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You would need to get permission from your penpals. Until then the images will be seen as violating copyright. I have nominated them for deletion at Commons. Jay 💬 10:56, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hannah Pearl Utt (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:TOOSOON. Does not yet meet WP:NACTOR or WP:NFILMMAKER.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hannah Pearl Utt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hannah Pearl Utt, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karurarav! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hannah Pearl Utt

Hello, Karurarav. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hannah Pearl Utt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:36, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hannah Pearl Utt

Hello, Karurarav. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hannah Pearl Utt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hannah Pearl Utt

Hello, Karurarav. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hannah Pearl Utt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:03, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]