User talk:KatieCercone
KatieCercone, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi KatieCercone! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your submission at AfC Go! Push Pops was accepted
[edit]You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Gecko990 (talk) 04:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)KatieCercone (talk) 14:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)== Replaceable fair use File:Go! Push Pops Aerobic Utopia.jpg ==
Thanks for uploading File:Go! Push Pops Aerobic Utopia.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Fut.Perf. Thank you for your help. I have updated the file description page writing a full explanation of why the use of this image constitutes fair use and is not replaceable. Please let me know if I did this correctly. I am a new user of Wikipedia. KatieCercone (talk) 14:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Go! Push Pops (March 1)
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Go! Push Pops.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
December 2017
[edit]This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rayman60 (talk) 16:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Continued editing
[edit]You continue to edit the article despite being warned about your conflict of interest. Refrain from editing it. Rayman60 (talk) 11:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
I was not aware I am no longer allowed to edit the Go! Push Pops article. I redirected the broken links, used more neutral language and added several more outside reference links to meet general notability guideline, as prompted in the template messages, including major news sources from close to 15 professional independent art critics and global sites such as The Japan Times, DAZED Magazine and Art 21. The template messages should be removed on the page. I'd like another editor to review this article KatieCercone (talk) 13:03, 24 March 2018 (UTC) KatieCercone (talk) 08:48, 24 March 2018