User talk:Katymall

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Eric Shinseki has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Eric Shinseki was changed by Katymall (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955165 on 2015-09-21T19:32:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WARx2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WARx2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WARx2 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 19:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Guputa1111. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use talk pages

I noticed you recently posted to MichaelQSchmidt's userpage, instead of his talkpage. I have moved your comments, but keep in mind that you should be posting comments to user talk pages instead of user pages. Thank you. -- Orduin ^Discuss 20:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Katymall: While speedies usually do not apply to film articles, it was properly deleted for being a copyright violation... something which Wikipedia takes very seriously. If you wish to address the copyright violation (IE do not simply copy the content from this source), make sure the page is significantly different from what was deleted last April, and keep it neutral and not promotional in nature, it might be placed into a non-wiki'd user draft-space for you to work on. Interested? Okay with you Jimfbleak? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 20:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Schmidt, the page had multiple issues. It was a re-creation of a page that was already deleted twice at AfD. The only change to the article was that it had one review that could be counted as a RS. Some of the claims are false, such as the PBS Award. The "award" was actually a mention on a PBS post where they aggregated awards given at various film festivals. I also got the impression that PBS could be notified of awards. The person at PBS who wrote the post has confirmed that this was not an award from PBS and should not be represented as such. They actually seemed quite irritated that someone was misrepresenting the post. This post about the nature of the page makes it quite clear that it was not an award given out by PBS and just an aggregate. The crew for WarX2 are the only people who have claimed that this was an award. I still have the e-mail from PBS (the first one confirming that there was no award - there was a second one) stating that it is not an award from PBS and is just an aggregate, so I can provide that if needed. The only true things that the film has going for it is one review that shows up at Rotten Tomatoes and an award at some film festival. PBS does not name the film festival, just cites that it won something. The lack of coverage for this other award gives off the strong impression that it is not a notable award. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Schmidt, , thanks for ping. Having read Tokyogirl79's comments, I can't see much future in it Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I note the suggestion of socking too Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mkdw ^talk 13:12, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]