User talk:Kavaskous

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Kavaskous, and welcome to Wikipedia.I hope you like the place and decide to become a productive contributor. Your contributions are easily tracked and monitored. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:53, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:53, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Ken Ham. Optakeover ^(Talk) 16:55, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Optakeover. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

And please read the above closely. Thank you. Optakeover ^(Talk) 17:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I'm not American, thank you. Secondly, I don't need you to tell me he's a cultist. You might be right, but that doesn't matter. All things put on Wikipedia must be backed by reliable sources. Also, wikipedia is WP:NEUTRAL. As this is an article on a person, you are required to maintain a neutral point of view because he is still a human being. You may not like him for being a cultist or whatever. That doesn't mean you can post whatever you think about him. Optakeover ^(Talk) 17:20, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, for the sake of net neutrality I will bite my tongue on the truth, despite the fact that posting the truth is neutral by default. Just give me back my account since I never went against the warnings issued against me, just complained to you editers.

This is your last chance. If you bother or irritate an editor as you did User talk:Optakeover, you may get blocked from editing. Thank you Amitabhfan (talk) 17:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiPedia still says there is no "Kavaskous" user.

User:Kavaskous is blank because you have not created a user page.* As you can see from [1] you are in fact a registered user who has been making edits.

.*note that there are things you can include on the page and things you cannot include (and ranting about living people or cults falls into the things you cannot do)-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:36, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Let_the_reader_decide Rhoark (talk) 17:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted your userpage as it was being used as an attack platform. Any continuation of violations of our policies regarding living persons will result in an immediate block.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Automated Market Maker[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Automated Market Maker has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appeared to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. David Gerard (talk) 12:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]