User talk:Khan Bababa

Welcome!

Hello, Khan Bababa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. IamNotU (talk) 05:06, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied text from Pakistani cuisine to Kebab (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:42, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kabuli palaw, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:18, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Abdul Ali Mazari

Hey there, what was your reason for reverting my edit on Abdul Ali Mazari? --Cerebellum (talk) 15:34, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i replied on the post too. well Afghan conflict is a ethnic mess and is very complicated.It is something far worse than Taliban. i would suggest you to read about Hazara Persecution in Afghanistan starting from Afghan Genocide of 1880s, provided the links in the post which are related. thanks, cheers.

Yes I understand the Hazara persecution and the 1880s genocide. I'm just talking about the part where it says that Hazaras "are still being persecuted by Afghan State." We have to find a source for that to keep it in the article. The sources in the article only say that the Taliban and Islamic State are persecuting the Hazaras, not the Afghan government. The closest thing I could find was the Morning Star article where it says that the Hazaras "are also neglected by the Afghan government." Do you have any other sources to back up this claim? --Cerebellum (talk) 01:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Me being from that region know how things are bad. The ISIS have Afghan State Support which uses terrorists to suppress Hazaras. the press in Afghanistan is not free. there are couple of news channels and all are state controlled. the Afghan Nationalism it self has hatred for Hazaras. To understand this please read regions's History and understand things. read about Malistan Massacres where the Afghan Govt. deliberately delayed deployment of troops in the city which caused ISIS to killed 100s of Hazaras. there are many such incidents. www.nytimes.com/2015/11/22/world/asia/kidnappings-escalate-in-afghanistan.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share www.facebook.com/keyhan.farahmand/posts/1104705886257668 economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/us-military-allegedly-promoting-isis-in-afghanistan/articleshow/68986884.cms t.co/ji03b57kW9?amp=1 www.asianage.com/world/asia/110118/isis-cells-operate-in-kabul-under-noses-of-afghan-and-us-forces.html

November 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nader Shah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. you removed the source and then claimed it's unsourced —SpacemanSpiff 05:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

went through the source there is no mention of it? this is reverse vandalism.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Khan Bababa (talk • contribs)

It was mentioned in the source:

In other eighteenth-century contemporary chronicles, particularly those by Indian authors, Nadir was depicted as a great military figure, one of the pre-eminent warriors of his time, but also as a brutal tyrant acting as an agent of divine vengeance. One contemporary Punjabi poet portrayed Nadir's reign as a time when "when all of India trembled with horror". Eighteenth-century century European accounts of Nadir's life were colored by attempts to compare him to other fabled conquerors of the past such as Alexander.

Alivardi (talk) 11:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Noorullah21 (talk) 20:41, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Khan Bababa. You appear to be edit warring at Bajaur Campaign and you have never used the article talk page. Expressing your disagreement in edit summaries, over and over, is not a good way of reaching consensus. EdJohnston (talk) 22:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi EdJohnston this user Noorullah21 is changing the page again and again and adding his own perceptions as sources. i've read the source which he gave and it does not mentions what he says.he is spinning the artcile based on his own likes and leanings. you can check it yourself not only this, he has been changing contents of the page for some time. please tell him that this is a neutral area not some nationalist playzone. Thanks

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Noorullah21 (talk) 01:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]